httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??
Date Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:18:18 GMT
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:11 AM, David Favor <david@davidfavor.com> wrote:

> Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, David Favor <david@davidfavor.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Biggest problem is with Apache changing format of conf entries.
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean by the format?
>>
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/upgrading.html covers this...
> snippet...
>
>    In this example, all requests are allowed.
>
>    2.2 configuration:
>
>    Order allow,deny
>    Allow from all
>
>    2.4 configuration:
>
>    Require all granted
>
> This is what bricked everyone's Apache config.
>

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_access_compat.html


>
> Also, as I recall, conf files also changed to require having a .conf
> suffix,
> which also meant every conf file had to be renamed + all old symlinks
> removed
> (from sites-enabled) + all domains re-enabled.
>

Is that a Debian thing?  Apache httpd didn't make any such change.


>
> Neither of these were a big deal + still make domains go dark.
>
> When I updated several 1000s of my client domains went dark. Till I figured
> out these niggling reasons... it was a very bad day...
>
> - David
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
http://edjective.org/

Mime
View raw message