httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edgar Pettijohn <ed...@pettijohn.no-ip.biz>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??
Date Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:36:33 GMT
"Upgrades should be about new features and new codes/syntax but the old
one should still work"

I agree 100%


On 07/18/2014 12:31 PM, Good Guy wrote:
> On 18/07/2014 15:35, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:21  AM, David Favor <david@davidfavor.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Biggest problem is with Apache changing format of conf entries.
> >
> > What do you mean by the format?
> >
>
> I think what he is talking about is that for each upgrades, apache
> becomes non-compliance with the previous version.  So if you plan to
> use the same conf file to speed up the implementation then you are
> likely to be stuck because some entries in the conf file won't work
> and throw out errors.
>
> Upgrades should be about new features and new codes/syntax but the old
> one should still work.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message