httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tyler Wilson <k...@linuxdigital.net>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??
Date Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:52:35 GMT
I just recently attempted upgrading an old cluster to 2.4 however due to
massive use of old .htaccess rules with allow/denies it simply wasn't worth
the effort to migrate everything to the new configurations.


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, David Benfell
<benfell@parts-unknown.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:43:17PM -0500, Joey J wrote:
> > Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only
> > used by 2.5% of active Apache sites.   Why is the adoption so low??
> > The Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for
> > some time and looking at the improvements I see significant value in
> > several.  I don't see any reason why anybody wouldn't want to use it
> > but the community seems to think it's bad.
> >
> I'm actually fighting my way through this upgrade now. It's not that I
> think 2.4 is bad. Not at all. It's just that the upgrade is difficult
> and I have other things I need to be working on.
>
> --
> David Benfell <benfell@parts-unknown.org>
> See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the
> attachment.
>

Mime
View raw message