Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 143A010557 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48346 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2014 10:46:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 48292 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2014 10:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 48284 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2014 10:46:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jessh@ptc.com designates 12.11.148.84 as permitted sender) Received: from [12.11.148.84] (HELO irp2.ptc.com) (12.11.148.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:46:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ptc.com; i=jessh@ptc.com; q=dns/txt; s=ptc; t=1395398763; x=1426934763; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; z=Message-ID:=20<532C1845.1030002@ptc.com>|Date:=20Fri,=20 21=20Mar=202014=2005:45:25=20-0500|From:=20Jess=20Holle =20|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20|Subject:=20Re:=20[users@httpd]=20Memory=20al location=20to=20apache=20process|References:=20=09=09=20 |In-Reply-To:=20; bh=GmtPFKzS4e4e/jMZfz6mazqYK19z+rVyIsnkhXJ60E4=; b=NPWvZgIZzU70BOGFDmsyID4S87HuahSbvZNkrbE2N4806oa25JS7lHap EqaLjx3wJXKh0QmCEs27N3LYNUvDpEVGiSZeipNvIpR2Lhm2+9J/D9Yhv sN22AdfZcZ9NzYJlwam3sEbP3VWK0hrpamS3vCU7YZPh0ryQ056XAmFyK 0=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,703,1389762000"; d="scan'208,217";a="173637657" Received: from hq-x10prdhub2.ptcnet.ptc.com ([132.253.198.28]) by irp2.ptc.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2014 06:45:28 -0400 Received: from [10.196.0.72] (10.196.0.72) by int-mail.ptc.com (132.253.201.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.123.3; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:45:28 -0400 Message-ID: <532C1845.1030002@ptc.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:45:25 -0500 From: Jess Holle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080502060006090802050208" X-Originating-IP: [10.196.0.72] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Memory allocation to apache process --------------080502060006090802050208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Something's not right here... The original message stated that "my windows RAM has been increased". Yet the response says that prefork workers are used. The Windows platform only supports one MPM -- one specifically for Windows. On 3/21/2014 12:47 AM, Voshka Niknam wrote: > Hello, > make it use MPM_Worker or the newest one MPM_EVENT > > prefork is none threaded and slow one and in high requests it consumes > more memory > > also fastcgi cache requests in an ammount of time and you should see > the documentation to change the duration to make it free up the cached > requests periodically in a smaller duration > Thanks > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Shanmugavel MANI > > wrote: > > Hillo Voshka, > > Thanks for your reply. fastcgi and prefork,workers. > > thanks in advance. > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Voshka Niknam > wrote: > > Hello, > > what is your apache handler and the MPM used? > > Thanks > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Shanmugavel MANI > > wrote: > > Recently my windows RAM has been increased. Wanted to > increase/allocate memory to apache process too.. is there > a way ? > > thanks. > > > > > -- > Woshka Niknam > PHP, ActionScript 3.0 Programmer > Linux Administrator Level III > Server Manager > WebHosting Specialist > www.woshka.com > > > > > > -- > Woshka Niknam > PHP, ActionScript 3.0 Programmer > Linux Administrator Level III > Server Manager > WebHosting Specialist > www.woshka.com --------------080502060006090802050208 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Something's not right here...

The original message stated that "my windows RAM has been increased".

Yet the response says that prefork workers are used.

The Windows platform only supports one MPM -- one specifically for Windows.

On 3/21/2014 12:47 AM, Voshka Niknam wrote:
Hello,
make it use MPM_Worker or the newest one MPM_EVENT

prefork is none threaded and slow one and in high requests it consumes more memory

also fastcgi cache requests in an ammount of time and you should see the documentation to change the duration to make it free up the cached requests periodically in a smaller duration
 
Thanks


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Shanmugavel MANI <ershanmugavel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hillo Voshka,

              Thanks for your reply.  fastcgi and prefork,workers.

thanks in advance.


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Voshka Niknam <voshkan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

what is your apache handler and the MPM used?

Thanks


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Shanmugavel MANI <ershanmugavel@gmail.com> wrote:
Recently my windows RAM  has been increased.  Wanted to increase/allocate memory to apache process too.. is there a way ?

thanks.



--
Woshka Niknam
PHP, ActionScript 3.0 Programmer
Linux Administrator Level III
Server Manager
WebHosting Specialist
www.woshka.com




--
Woshka Niknam
PHP, ActionScript 3.0 Programmer
Linux Administrator Level III
Server Manager
WebHosting Specialist
www.woshka.com

--------------080502060006090802050208--