Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 989A4D37F for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42084 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2013 12:58:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42054 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2013 12:58:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42028 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2013 12:58:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:58:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aparnapuram@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:58:08 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi18so796022wib.15 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:57:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0rzNLf9L0XfCteMQk9hSDz93vIOca+l6l12HnIjef/A=; b=mV/VFrJUmeAP1M1v7b6cV2TfoqTjm+jcad1HXjAGi0YcAg9DxEHSgvK3En5imX/w/3 CXDpM8ZGEwFTuOp5cJ23vLJQqu+u57tNF9cElZD5A64raBEFPCKfAFN0yF2u/tamzax4 SYCux3LFRyZfLBwosn7qh1x5MGRoDCX+P4FUK26M+FuCzROaWddw0FckVaVQmX6NfhIE s6pjTPVVnWgw2EgYIgg8j+8ZYf1AW9AhOLiBmo3WkhOzd6yHg2uWOR911NNuMIia0ejQ iAc8GL1NwECv4F734HN3d3RPylfZvKDwNUGY+4vlEC+0OvwMiwhQ+hs03IUghv6sGOtF J3zw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.104.137 with SMTP id ge9mr9439923wjb.59.1360328259188; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.248.131 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 04:57:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:27:39 +0530 Message-ID: From: aparna Puram To: users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d8388aab67f04d5361a6b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [users@httpd] LoadBalancingIssue - Users are not distributed equally among users --089e010d8388aab67f04d5361a6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello All, We have a apache server that acts as a load balancer for 6 backend tomcat servers. However, If I compare the load on all the servers, there is a drastic difference between the no of hits on all the servers. We are using lbmethod =bybusyness. Please help, If there are any tools to check if the tomcat is really busy and that's the reason the apache is not sending request to it. Are there any tools to measure the load that is being balanced to all the tomcats? -- Regards, Aparna Puram +919449473709 --089e010d8388aab67f04d5361a6b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All,

We have a apache server that acts as a = load balancer for 6 backend tomcat servers.

However, If I compare th= e load on all the servers, there is a drastic difference between the no of = hits on all the servers.

We are using lbmethod =3Dbybusyness.

Please help, If there are a= ny tools to check if the tomcat is really busy and that's the reason th= e apache is not sending request to it.

Are there any tools to measur= e the load that is being balanced to all the tomcats?
--
Regards,
Aparna Puram
+919449473709
--089e010d8388aab67f04d5361a6b--