Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D2E9D214 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13575 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2012 14:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13175 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2012 14:44:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13137 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2012 14:44:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tevans.uk@googlemail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.45] (HELO mail-vb0-f45.google.com) (209.85.212.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:25 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p1so3436383vbi.18 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:44:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9hMcbv5uUMrcPZ+9Tohlw+AxNpuqsggJ/Nk89phd1UY=; b=toLT/bgmNxEISwsXt92R2GjvUHS/bRb/OmdtTSEXBmkohrm4rMrcvZWA3XhCX3qMFW SAykdPHMjIoAKBhVPnrdcJ5BhncuiNsVPYqKzV3YsGTIp7KEHXRTR/wLEcXtkp8qpYnP gSw5gGxrA3+sHnP4PFmgcr1XyVR0Gqls6RknrDMVG3/RhviKr1dguZOpSI9ZShuC4/Pb NVWtjIN6uohgOboy6ihBiXrhocb+bx4xC8HATMITIH4Rjj6XvQDOiwl7DcIx5fGZ/xfC 6wWPj2WMB7AkF4UBEkL3pySjqEN8x40taEzQUQRZ6muYKJxO1lfDJPRjKHp+9b5RbKJj EXLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.64.51 with SMTP id l19mr9379292ves.15.1355150644453; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:44:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.233.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:44:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355010305.5531.9.camel@fermat.scientia.net> References: <1355010305.5531.9.camel@fermat.scientia.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:04 +0000 Message-ID: From: Tom Evans To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] how to use ProxyPassReverse* with more complex a ProxyPassMatch On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using a reverse proxy set up with ProxyPassMatch as the space I map > to is rather complex and can't be mapped with a normal ProxyPass. > > > Now the problem is obviously that: > ProxyPassReverse > ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain > ProxyPassReverseCookiePath > are only made for the simply ProxyPass form and there are no > ProxyPassReverseMatch* versions. > > Is this planned and is there some way to work around this in the > meantime? > > > Thanks, > Chris. Use ProxyPassReverse, or simplify your application's urlspace such that you can use ProxyPassReverse. You may have to explain why you cannot use ProxyPassReverse, eg by supplying a sample scenario. Cheers Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org