Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33882DD43 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46803 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2012 20:36:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46778 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2012 20:36:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46769 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2012 20:36:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:36:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.28] (HELO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:36:29 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDF820FC4; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:36:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:36:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=catseye.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=Hz5yPiLtXiD773YCi9s1MQPzQEo=; b=hrf16GLYp+5KWjKm5NpPEQ0RyjXz trjQF53jqDhBaJ8HVP6DYP1th5m2QIgWjtWDVozzIYVfrv3Ntff+gy0xhGFEgbB4 gM48sGIzGCwGF4nr4JsxNRMCzmA6FolNV8fKNYW8sSgfLDsH+sO2KWQmP7VKl+8m IyLPlaSdZWCwVdY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=Hz5yPiLtXiD773YCi9s1MQ PzQEo=; b=T/KU8fN8eb6W+psolzTJtnIulWJv7B77PV05gukHbTPAigVCV01jYB 0PofXcAIclwlAxzxO82c45ZbTgdS0glcP4mXsBD7v3yOLQz8xdR3Aorz3zy860Gs gV5DlG45TZH2GiuwSDRjEQu6Dtb6DXAB/EUUkdOI9fg5vf3PlwEEI= X-Sasl-enc: GWoAZX82VUxO6K3G/nFmFJnIRmucIu9ipdDtHG8gDkvd 1354221368 Received: from 67-194-83-99.wireless.umnet.umich.edu (unknown [67.194.83.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 77FB98E05AB; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:36:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50B7C738.2030403@catseye.org> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:36:08 -0500 From: Mark Montague User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20120916 Thunderbird/16.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org CC: Alvise Nicoletti References: <50B7BB94.9060101@alvisenicoletti.com> In-Reply-To: <50B7BB94.9060101@alvisenicoletti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 stability & ErrorLogFormat On November 29, 2012 14:46 , Alvise Nicoletti wrote: > I would like to use the ErrorLogFormat function (a > apache2.4 > function), > because I have a lot of php websites in a same Virtual Host / > directory and I would like to have better error reporting. > [...] > > So I ask, is 2.4 stable ? > > Do you have any tips to workaround the problem maybe with an apache mod ? What does "stable" mean to you? For what it is worth, 2.4 is a production release of Apache HTTP Server: it is not a development version, it is not an alpha version, and it is not a beta version. People are using Apache HTTP Server 2.4 successfully in production. I have not heard any complaints about it failing to serve its intended purpose. As for workarounds, you could try to backport the feature from 2.4 to 2.2, but I recommend against this, in general: if you have to compile Apache HTTP Server from source, just compile an unmodified version of 2.4 -- even counting the cost of learning about the new features and making some changes to your existing configuration, I think this will be much easier than backporting a feature to 2.2 and then supporting it yourself in-house long term. -- Mark Montague mark@catseye.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org