Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.browder@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50886F04.8010607@catseye.org>
References: 
 <CAFMGiz82ZOFZVNqpkeShiiNu7s72hhHEhxsAfFFEK8K_wrCzhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <50886F04.8010607@catseye.org>
From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:03:46 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAFMGiz_jcozP9ULzFwN3ise5435e1zq6Hf2CoDYzU58cqc+YyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Montague <mark@catseye.org>
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] OpenSSL vs. Mozilla's NSS

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Mark Montague <mark@catseye.org> wrote:
> On October 24, 2012 18:24 , Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> wrote:
...
>> Is it possible to use Apache with the NSS libraries instead of OpenSSL?
> If your problems are just with generating / signing certificates, you don't
> need to use the same SSL libraries that Apache HTTP Server and mod_ssl are
> using.  You can use mod_ssl with OpenSSL but use whatever software you want
> to use for managing your certificates.

You are correct, but the point I was trying to make was that maybe NSS
has something to offer with cleaner code, etc., based on the quality
of the documentation compared to OpenSSL.

In the meantime I've discovered mod_nss and will look closer at that.

Best,

-Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org