Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D99DC0F for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3579 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2012 02:30:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3506 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2012 02:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3495 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2012 02:30:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:30:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chenshuoshi@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:30:02 +0000 Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so9026970obb.18 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:29:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HKPRDpFXRH5JCS6qT8XkFeZM2nJXU6zfibyLEaDK0m4=; b=r6n4H8hYU9DZWR4WUByBqLMjn6ub0kl8QpRigXIwk9x5y9aeOO6TodU+tJ91Endtdc WJ/PvFdfQ3WUFcc97m4HF5qD4vuJvaHKNIXHbny+H5VCH1rkfkffeD0TcHklwrZO0vpC wDLdC4mk9dlO9XKHX3Jqs3VKg4ZL/k4kFMRkd/scyEFoCq8U7wXt78ppKqnKkEpPjoUN R9VhuQlwNvgLuMmyDXSPLTLE2uLfeM+1ZifGxqyuAmXw5iQCsDuQuRquR2yzDLm4UH3I GEnYSAQSkb0AyYiu/5MpgBHGxYFdHSGs3tvAzMwypD95KVLQ0oUa/wfJu+ZToctshyrK VPfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.208.105 with SMTP id md9mr5393902igc.12.1343528981305; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.25.228 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:29:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5012D5DA.8060702@kippdata.de> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 10:29:41 +0800 Message-ID: From: shuoshi chen To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340609ad197a04c5eeb782 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache server returned a lots Continuation or non-HTTP traffic packages instead of full package --14dae9340609ad197a04c5eeb782 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for replying! I've compared the two configuration file, and have no clue... I was wondering there's some configuration that decompose the big package into a lots smaller packages to avoid second full package transportation in case of fault. But when I used my local configuration file on the VPS server, it still gives out a lots small packages... don't know why. 2012/7/28 Filipe Cifali > What happened? Timeout? Broken file? Dropped streaming? > > Em sexta-feira, 27 de julho de 2012, Rainer Jung escreveu: > > On 27.07.2012 08:11, shuoshi chen wrote: >> >>> Hi, all >>> >>> I recently use apache server to provide mp3 stream for playing. The >>> content type is specified as audio/mpeg, and everything is ok when I use >>> a test server( Apache/2.2.22 (Unix)), it returned an HTTP/1.1 200 >>> (audio/mpeg) package. But when I put my code to a VPS server, I can't >>> get a full package as normal. The VPS server returned a >>> lots Continuation or non-HTTP traffic packages. Is it because of some >>> wrong configuration in httpd.conf? >>> >> >> What is a VPS server? How is the production VPS server related to your >> test Apache server? I guess you need to give more details ... >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org >> >> > > -- > []'s > > Filipe Cifali Stangler > > --14dae9340609ad197a04c5eeb782 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for replying! I've compared the two configuration file, and have= =20 no clue... I was wondering there's some configuration that decompose th= e big package into a lots smaller packages to avoid second full package=20 transportation=A0 in case of fault. But when I used my local configuration file on the VPS server, it still gives out a lots small packages...=20 don't know why.

2012/7/28 Filipe Cifa= li <cifali.filipe@gmail.com>
What happened? Timeout? Broken file? Dropped streaming?=A0
=
Em sexta-feira, 27 de julho de 2012, Rainer Jung escreveu:

On 27.07.2012 08:11, shuoshi chen wrote:
Hi, all

I recently use apache server to provide mp3 stream for playing. The
content type is specified as audio/mpeg, and everything is ok when I use a test server( Apache/2.2.22 (Unix)), it returned an HTTP/1.1 200
(audio/mpeg) package. But when I put my code to a VPS server, I can't get a full package as normal. The VPS server returned a
lots Continuation or non-HTTP traffic packages. Is it because of some
wrong configuration in httpd.conf?

What is a VPS server? How is the production VPS server related to your test= Apache server? I guess you need to give more details ...

Regards,

Rainer


-------------------------------------------------------------= --------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org



--
[]'s

Filipe Cifali Stangler


--14dae9340609ad197a04c5eeb782--