httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <kashif.rah...@in.com>
Subject RE: [users@httpd] Software Load Balancers | mod_proxy_balancer and Varnish
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:02:41 GMT
You need to decide what options you want from Varnish or mod_proxy_balancer.

 

Both are different. Varnish is basically for cache and you will not achieve
cache from mod_proxy_balancer. 

 

You can use mod_proxy_balancer for failover and then use Varnish for better
performance/cache on both nodes.

 

Do let me know what are your concerns and specifically what you are looking
in them for.

 

Thank you,

 

Best Regards,


Kashif Rahman

Principal SCM Engineer

Description: vopium_signature_logo

 

Description: imagesCAV9FMB1 + 92 334 9771227 | Description: imagesCAXWPPLS
kashif_r | w  www.vopium.com <http://www.vopium.com/> 

 

From: Anurag Kapur [mailto:anuragkapur@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 4:01 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Software Load Balancers | mod_proxy_balancer and
Varnish

 

No, I am looking to pick one of mod_proxy_balancer or varnish and thus
looking for pros and cons.

 

Anurag



On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@gmail.com>
wrote:

Ldirectord

 


Mime
View raw message