Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C201B9809 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 482 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 09:42:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99627 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 09:42:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99619 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2012 09:42:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:42:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of Laurent.DENIS@mail.mobistar.be) Received: from [212.65.63.145] (HELO thuban.mobistar.be) (212.65.63.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:42:39 +0000 Received: from brownheart.winprod.mobistar.be (brownheart [175.175.20.53]) by thuban.mobistar.be (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q169gHxR002793 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:42:17 +0100 Received: from mors.mobilebelgium.be (unverified) by brownheart.winprod.mobistar.be (Internal mail checking) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:42:11 +0100 Received: from oceanus.mobilebelgium.be ([172.18.105.12]) by mors.mobilebelgium.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:42:11 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCE4B3.9959B688" Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:42:10 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F2F9C2C.80107@uls.co.za> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd Thread-Index: AczksTHXttPal6afS7ORJW6G3ecnPgAAiaJg References: <4F2F99D2.1040609@uls.co.za> <4F2F9C2C.80107@uls.co.za> From: "DENIS Laurent" To: Cc: "Harsimranjit singh Kler" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2012 09:42:11.0349 (UTC) FILETIME=[998F5C50:01CCE4B3] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1345-6.5.1024-18626.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.515700-8.000000-31 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd ------_=_NextPart_001_01CCE4B3.9959B688 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you just want failover on the head apache: use two nodes with vrrp + keepalived (if you're on linux) to monitor your service. =20 If you need load-balancing, then you should use two VRRP addresses with DNS round-robin. But you'll stumble on client-server persistence problem if you don't use tomcat clustering. =20 =20 From: Jaco Kroon [mailto:jaco@uls.co.za]=20 Sent: Monday 6 February 2012 10:24 To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Harsimranjit singh Kler Subject: Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd =20 Not that I'm aware of but someone else on the list may very well know something I don't. May I inquire as to why not? Kind Regards, Jaco On 06/02/12 11:17, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:=20 Its is not possible for me to use "haproxy" in my setup. Is there alternate to use with Apache only? =20 On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Jaco Kroon wrote: Hi, Perhaps look at "haproxy" instead of apache. Run it on two or more machines with multiple IPs and have then distribute the load to your Tomcat worker nodes. Kind Regards, Jaco=20 On 06/02/12 11:09, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote: Hi How i can make apache httpd High Available(HA)?.If i want to achive with out hardware based HA. I have httpd 2.2.17 on one Phsical Node(IP xxx.xxx.xxx) and Six Tomcat worker on other 6 Phsical Node.Now if IP xxx.xxx.xxx goes down my application completly down.? regards Harsimran =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org =20 =20 *****DISCLAIMER***** This electronic transmission (and any attached document) is intended=20 exclusively for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may=20 contain confidential and/or privileged material.=20 Any disclosure, copying, distribution or other action based upon=20 the information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please contact the=20 sender and delete the material from any and all computers.=20 Mobistar does not warrant a proper and complete transmission of this information, nor does it accept liability for any delays. *****END OF DISCLAIMER***** ------_=_NextPart_001_01CCE4B3.9959B688 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= If you just want failover on the head apache: use two nodes with vrr= p + keepalived (if you’re on linux) to monitor your service.

 

If you need load-balancing, then you should use two V= RRP addresses with DNS round-robin. But you’ll stumble on client-serv= er persistence problem if you don’t use tomcat clustering.=

 

 

From: = Jaco Kroon [mailto:jaco@uls.co.za]
Sent: Monday 6 February 2012 = 10:24
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Harsimranjit singh= Kler
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache = httpd

 

Not that I'm aware of but someone else on the list may very well = know something I don't.

May I inquire as to why not?

Kind Reg= ards,
Jaco

On 06/02/12 11:17, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:


Its i= s not possible for me  to use "haproxy" in my setup. Is ther= e alternate to use with Apache only?


 

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:43= PM, Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>= ; wrote:

Hi= ,

Perhaps look at "haproxy" instead of apache.  Run i= t on two or more machines with multiple IPs and have then distribute the lo= ad to your Tomcat worker nodes.

Kind Regards,
Jaco



On 06/= 02/12 11:09, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:

Hi
How i can make apache httpd High Ava= ilable(HA)?.If i want to achive with out hardware based HA.
I have httpd= 2.2.17 on one Phsical Node(IP xxx.xxx.xxx) and Six Tomcat worker on other = 6 Phsical Node.Now if IP xxx.xxx.xxx goes down my application completly dow= n.?
regards
Harsimran

 

---= ------------------------------------------------------------------
The o= fficial User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
Se= e <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To uns= ubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
 "  = ; from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For= additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

 

 

*****DISCLAIMER*****<= /span>

 

This electronic trans= mission (and any attached document) is intended

exclusively for the p= erson or entity to whom it is addressed and may

contain confidential = and/or privileged material.

Any disclosure, copyi= ng, distribution or other action based upon

the information by pe= rsons or entities other than the intended recipient

is prohibited. If you= receive this message in error, please contact the

sender and delete the= material from any and all computers.

Mobistar does not war= rant a proper and complete transmission of this

information, nor does= it accept liability for any delays.

 

*****END OF DISCLAIME= R*****

------_=_NextPart_001_01CCE4B3.9959B688--