Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bmillett@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.173 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bmillett@gmail.com designates
 10.236.201.201 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.201.201;
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:45:09 -0600
From: Brian Millett <bmillett@gmail.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Message-ID: <20120225084509.161b6cd6@dufus>
In-Reply-To: <BLU159-W54144AB94E28DB357E8708AB6B0@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU159-W54144AB94E28DB357E8708AB6B0@phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] using a vendor's apache

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:06:45 +0000
Edward Quick <edwardquick@hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Apache Users,
> The place where I work is embarking on a project to migrate custom apache
> builds to the RHEL6 build. Obviously that brings certain limitations (not
> being able to use the snazzy new Apache 2.4 version for example!!) I was
> curious whether anyone else had gone down this route, and what their
> experiences were like, and whether they were pleased with the end result.

My experience has to do with PCI compliancy.  Most of the compliancy checkers
look for the version number, so the latest rhel version (even though it has
all of the patches) fails due to having a lower rev than what it is looking
for to be compliant.

-- 
Brian Millett
"If anyone asks, say it fell from the sky."
   -- [ Delenn to Sinclair (re: Vorlon files), "The Gathering"]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org