Return-Path: 
 <users-return-102098-apmail-httpd-users-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90B779713
	for <apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 15982 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2011 20:43:02 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15952 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2011 20:43:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:users-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15944 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2011 20:43:02 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:43:02 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.210.173] (HELO mail-iy0-f173.google.com)
 (209.85.210.173)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:42:55 +0000
Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so32245157iag.18
        for <users@httpd.apache.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:42:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=wm9MgsgoAz9yZDTf+D9EA0sAP2f9MKshqVwF+M97aZ0=;
        b=rjsAcCP/j3OkVI/OCqwG/VzCbgt9togsVevqxvQEVX9p3t2FPG7PQmqNaH5b/g60u7
         3/ktabJhKaYkPjhInvH0Ym7U6TdTrszvPm4vP2EI8i8UU2f2woaHy3kBw5SYEAgoEkGM
         iCfD2vIza+EX6ZkN3oFBDKBekYLDz5KcZjQVY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.187.226 with SMTP id fv2mr47648316igc.20.1325277754002;
 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.178.10 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:42:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABBDWwdmDEx=aT9W3SZ=5Yt65GJZ5WVX6KDTCREyx4zZutfPhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABBDWwdmDEx=aT9W3SZ=5Yt65GJZ5WVX6KDTCREyx4zZutfPhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:42:33 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CALK=YjPLTtk1gFQNvkZMBeEWTkCU8X+Trr4sbLWZEdV9eX1DpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Why the NameVirtualHost detective?

> My question is on the other side: what will happen when a <VirtualHost> is
> defined without NameVirtualHost?

Then you won't be able to access two different configurations using
the same local ip:port with two different hostnames, which is what
name-based virtualhosting adds.

NameVirtualHost is removed in 2.3/2.4 -- we now just treat overlaps as
implicit name-based virtual hosts (but lose the ability to report on
unintended overlaps of normal IP-based vhosts)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org