httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Asaf Dalet <asaf.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] apr_off_t mismatch
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:34:05 GMT
Igor,
so you are saying this is a bug in the precompiled version of apr 1.2.2 in
sunfreeware.com?

2011/11/24 Igor Galić <i.galic@brainsware.org>

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > i am trying to ask this again:
> > i supply an apache 2.2 module to my customers. naturally, i need to
> > build my module for each OS, cpu architecture & bit scheme. So, if
> > my customer has Apache 2.2 on solaris sparc 32 bit - that's what i
> > need to build.
> >
> > however, from what i just discovered, there's another factor - LFS
> > support. My module needs to be compiled with the LFS enabled or
> > disabled - according to the specific apache of the specific
> > customer. The problem is that i can't know what LFS support the
> > apache was compiled with.
> >
> > This really shouts "bug" to me, but i would really like to know -
> > who's bug and how to fix it. for example, if the packages of apache
> > 2.2.0 with APR 1.2.2 on sunfreeware.com have a bug that was later
> > fixed - then i can tell my customer to upgrade to a later version.
> >
> > ???
>
> LFS is not a compile time feature starting 2.2, for one.
>
> For the other, my recommendation for high quality Solaris packages
> is to use OpenCSW (Getting started: pkgadd -d http://get.opencsw.org/now)
>
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Asaf Dalet < asaf.dalet@gmail.com >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > this means that apache modules for 2.2.0 32 bits, on solaris 9 are
> > not compatible across differemt ./configure options.
>
>
> Also note that Oracle has announced Solaris 9's EOS (or was it EOL?)
>
>
> > which actually means that if i want to check if my module will run on
> > a given apache - i cannot do it (there's no way to know a priori the
> > size of apr_off_t which apache was compiled with). am i right?
> >
> >
> >
> > by any chance, does anyone know what are the ./configure options that
> > control the size of apr_off_t, (if there are any)?
> >
> >
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > asaf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:23 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <
> > wrowe@rowe-clan.net > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/21/2011 9:48 AM, Asaf Dalet wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> > some interesting news:
> > I downloaded apr-1.2.2-sol9-sparc-local from sunfreeware.com <
> > http://sunfreeware.com > and
> >
> > installed it.
> > the file apr/include/apr-1/apr.h contains this line:
> > typedef long apr_off_t;
> >
> > does this mean apr 1.2.2 does not support LFS or is it some bug in
> > this precompiled APR?
> > appreciate any comment
> >
> > It means either 1) the builder deliberately forced this behavior
> > through options to ./configure, or 2) apr fails to detect that
> > LFS is available in the builder's environment. I suspect 1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> i
>
> --
> Igor Galić
>
> Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
> Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
> URL: http://brainsware.org/
> GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message