Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98211 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 22:56:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 22:56:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 58973 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 22:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 58952 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 22:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 58944 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 22:56:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:56:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.173] (HELO mail-wy0-f173.google.com) (74.125.82.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:56:43 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so1153874wyb.18 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:56:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ls4jHqv4BCEIdNw40990TS4bw+DOxbkJ4sWZ1FSfdoA=; b=NpM6IZI5VhNkuNTAGLSVZD+YwZPJZzSUPKA6aTNoIzF0IJCJ6T5TZlE+FJdxG407DE jg7mt1NgTH6Ld4tdnaMZUMoBDodwVJ6Kk5EzSV/bkHfcc+yeYYx3G/wM/UFtpxYNYWz8 U/uKE56IB+HXntemCNBBrqh25/eKAJp3yfJwY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=M6ndQqx7bw7WbKX9DYC7tlf5hiiDCBemUhUrpx1C3HDY3BDiyBQR5yXRns7QszA4Yg WFSrXZvc3vLxEUobpWtWLiqDSRptGfoon4FJn949WFSArs00g5Ldlj4B+MhlSOBm9jdo k49ZHZ4jLVGysh8gjnDIRu7KJuABpePwQqLrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.62.144 with SMTP id y16mr1898733wec.101.1299711382364; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:56:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.180.6 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:56:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8EDA3C194A2D994DBEBB95D3446AA5F207AB95DF78@PFGDSMMBX001.principalusa.corp.principal.com> References: <8EDA3C194A2D994DBEBB95D3446AA5F207AB95DDF9@PFGDSMMBX001.principalusa.corp.principal.com> <8EDA3C194A2D994DBEBB95D3446AA5F207AB95DF78@PFGDSMMBX001.principalusa.corp.principal.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:56:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Trawick To: "Feldhacker, Chris" Cc: "users@httpd.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Slow performance of Apache on Windows On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Feldhacker, Chris wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 4:05 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Slow performance of Apache on Windows > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Feldhacker, Chris wrote: >>> Summary: >>> Apache HTTP Server 2.2.17 running on Windows Server 2003 & 2008 has sli= ght HTTP transfer performance problems with Windows XP clients, and *extrem= e* performance problems with Windows 7 clients. >>> Apache HTTP Server running on RedHat Linux 5 performs fine with both XP= and W7 clients. >>> IIS and Small HTTP Server on Windows 2003/2008 perform fine with both X= P and W7 clients. > >> Did you ever get a network trace with IIS as the server to see how it di= ffers from the trace with Apache? > > Yes, the delayed acknowledgements by the client for the packet with the p= ush flag were no longer present -- acks were being sent very quickly. =A0(T= he time deltas for pretty much all network traffic was basically next to ze= ro.) =A0Other than the shortened delays, there were no other obvious differ= ences between the traces. ok; there must be something different though up until the point where the client does/does not delay before sending the packet odd number of packets up until this point with Apache, but even with the other servers? (odd is where the delay kicks in, right?) --/-- It is probably present in all that info somewhere, but how do we know that the TCP window size for IIS is not larger than the one for Apache? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org