httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Connection Issues
Date Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:29:10 GMT
On 29.11.2010 23:25, Travis Whitton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're experiencing some odd behavior regarding connections taking a
> long time to establish to our website. We've been running Apache in
> production for over three years now and have recently began
> experiencing issues where the server-status page, static, and dynamic
> content response times will slow anywhere from a few seconds to long
> enough for the connection to timeout.
>
> Initially thinking we might be hitting some hard limits with the OS,
> we've thoroughly audited our sysctl variables, tried disabling
> iptables and conntrack, and ensured that we're not running out of
> ephemeral ports or anything along those lines. Looking at netstat, it
> seems we have a pretty large number of connections in TIME_WAIT which
> is understandable since this is a high traffic website, but I'm
> wondering if this value could indicate we're backlogging on TCP
> connections or something along those lines?
>
> [root@RHL073 ipv4]# netstat -an | awk '/^tcp/ {A[$(NF)]++} END {for (I
> in A) {printf "%5d %s\n", A[I], I}}'
> 34723 TIME_WAIT
>      3 CLOSE_WAIT
>    275 FIN_WAIT1
>     74 FIN_WAIT2
>   8824 ESTABLISHED
>    815 SYN_RECV
>    102 CLOSING
>     30 LAST_ACK
>     10 LISTEN
>
> In an effort to tune things, I've tried playing with the TCP timeout
> settings a bit, and the response times have improved somewhat. Please
> note that I've been testing response times using the loopback
> interface to rule out any ethernet hardware issues.
>
> echo 15>  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
> echo 1>  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_recycle
> echo 1>  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_reuse
>
> We're running prefork, and have configured the client settings to what
> seem to be reasonable limits for our hardware.
>
> <IfModule prefork.c>
> StartServers       100
> MinSpareServers    100
> MaxSpareServers   200
> ServerLimit       1500
> MaxClients        1500
> MaxRequestsPerChild 1000000
> </IfModule>
>
> Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Yes, having lots of TME_WAIT can have a serious impact on TCP 
performance. So I think your approach is reasonable. Unfortunately (at 
leas that was true a few years ago), Linux does not support setting a 
timeout value for TIME_WAIT, as e.g. Solaris does. Unfortunately the 
docs about the reuse and recycle switches is far from being detailed.

Are you using HTTP Keep-Alive? Your high ESTABLISHED numbers suggest 
that. If not, that could reduce the TIME_WAIT numbers too, but comes 
with a price: you would get much higher ESTABLISHED rates (and thus need 
for even more httpd threads, typically about 5 times of what you see 
without Keep-Alive).

Regards,

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message