Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30222 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 17:01:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 17:01:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19173 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 17:02:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19132 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 17:02:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19122 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 17:02:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:02:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tevans.uk@googlemail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.45] (HELO mail-qw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.216.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:02:20 +0000 Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so1478289qwf.18 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:01:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/PdRbuMQx+8LWz5f6hVbGyvZv2afxdhD5nEUOnpO6DU=; b=B19hQeF+yLYtqw/ERRIp1fmFU3sT/GfwoVvECcKXhG7/+5t5TLG2yHlgSl4kria9Iy +PKMqt0FQpq3EIO+8cjPUsPG8UIVBOr/cpUMm2ta/gyGbottLCV5N6Q4slogN7e0HCKO 1Ap+bqxRKkHiObJ1Jv6B4iPDo40blWh7EEVxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DCUxMv+8rcWOKmkGxHCS0DEgyNR3GL9do0R3Rfc9bCO1ZU0gdzC6HevkZWc2WmlH8G +4kIJoGPPcMk0YIX+NrxZNoHlHk3hMfGCqT+uI/kGB3ZbK3byu5Nn5ND++q7RbUGQn1q 4h6fvc0fhbuC5W7YIBs+ax9RyW9c/HihxInEY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.189.4 with SMTP id dc4mr899369qcb.106.1288890118748; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.182.18 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD29148.6000907@gmail.com> References: <4CD29148.6000907@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:01:58 +0000 Message-ID: From: Tom Evans To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SSL redirect ? On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > Hiya > > I got an interesting request from a client and I was hoping to bounce this > off you guys. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > I need my linux server to accept incoming connections on port 8080 and > forward them to an HTTPS address and do all communications. > > So, if a developer connects to, and uses > > https://abc.com/v4/transaction?wsdl > > it should redirect, communicate, and return data from > > https://trans.api.hidden.com/v4/transaction?wsdl > > Basically, I need to mask the trans.api.hidden.com and make all > communications deal with abc.co.za. > > This is the same server. > > Personally I cant see this is possible, cause of the it been SSL. I would > assume this activity as no different as a MITM attack. > But googling, says I should look at mod_proxy. Is this possible? > > What do you guys think. If someone could help. It would be appreciated. > > Kind Regards > Brent Clark > If your client connects to https://abc.com/ , then that is where SSL will be terminated for the client. If you then proxy that connection to https://trans.api.hidden.com/ , then that will be a separate SSL connection between two apache servers, it will not carry any client certificates that the client initially presented to https://abc.com . wrt to your later question, apache is more than capable of proxying to itself. I'm not sure you would need the overhead of an SSL connection on a request that would never go on the wire. Cheers Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org