Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53652 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 00:42:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 00:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 25660 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 00:42:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25631 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 00:42:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25623 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 00:42:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:42:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.45] (HELO mail-qw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.216.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:42:01 +0000 Received: by qwg8 with SMTP id 8so839912qwg.18 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZIYIUdd7fjyeHn5yOn8AFB3+5tTLLcJ4h91qCNGV+t4=; b=E5i3fIxf82M4+IMcX2LS8i46U3r3ayLzx/GibBVHCREtT+TTy7xTSqmrUQPHQ7A721 SPiz/RA2Hi3lSBmRevmdcGcP8MRprcWrKcdDN0qF6qclSsim75ixpUqsPZxu4L1FEheq Mvhwgq904AMM4kUVE7GZvvLpBKVLIK2BAIvl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Nf+MA8Vnv4UsUzbyHb3Jboa6CFdCHLCSavY1MezghJNXIPwiRCLQ/zJ/4n2oupTp1i 8R4Vd9xlW4ZPhX6/vn5vITPz0HlImlBrcH0h8cPYhbdUqsLnkQOhLzzkfkqIVQ1gobVX wfrtwQAsItUYjMQ5mA3Lj3XnH/gr6mmZQkxYk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.249.213 with SMTP id ml21mr138616qcb.288.1278031250922; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.238.78 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55F9EF953014514EB6BEE1F5198CEEB407224BDD@exchange.slc.mainstreamdata.com> References: <55F9EF953014514EB6BEE1F5198CEEB407224BDD@exchange.slc.mainstreamdata.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:40:50 -0400 Message-ID: From: Eric Covener To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Win32 Apache HTTP performance/reliability problem > n Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Joe Novak wrot= e: > I set up a jmeter test to open a socket to Apache HTTP, request a very > small file, and close the socket. =A0Jmeter is running on the same box as > the Apache HTTP service. =A0At 2 sockets/second, there is a 3% error rate= . > At 5 sockets/second, the error rate increases to 8%. =A0Failures occur at > regular intervals. =A0With 2 sockets/second failure is about every 20 > minutes. =A0With 5 sockets/second, failure is at 15 minute intervals. > > In a separate jmeter test, I set up 1300 concurrent requests with a > delay between each run. =A0Failure occurred within just a few seconds. > The symptoms were much worse with this test. =A0Symptoms were very much > like a denial of service. =A0When I open a browser and manually download > the small file, the browser spins and never returns with a response. > > I have tried tweaking the Windows registry and the httpd.conf file to > improve performance, but nothing seems to help. =A0Relevant tweaks from > httpd.conf are shown below. > > ThreadLimit =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A03600 > ThreadsPerChild =A0 =A0 =A03200 > > I also tried the following to improve reliability, but it made no > difference. > > EnableMMAP off > EnableSendfile off > Win32DisableAcceptEx > > Has anyone else observed these problems? =A0Is there anything that can be > done to improve reliability or performance? =A0Thanks. what version of windows, and are you sure you didn't run out of usable client ports? --=20 Eric Covener covener@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org