httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Schenck <robschenck...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Reverse proxying is problematic
Date Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:10:22 GMT
Peter: Well, I'm an intern so I'm supposed to be "learning"..or something
like.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Peter Schober <peter.schober@univie.ac.at>wrote:

> * Robert Schenck <robschenck416@gmail.com> [2009-12-02 12:46]:
> > I have to use Apache, I don't have a choice (says my employer).
>
> This was just meant as a heads up: depending on the publisher you
> might have to rewrite most everything (URLs, HTML content, Cookies,
> JavaScript, etc.), and every publisher does things differently.
> If your employer really thinks reinventing this poorly is time and
> money well spent (vs. using something that is known to just work),
> then so be it.
> (Not that I actually promote the use of aforementioned product, since
> that will only prolong the misuse of IP-addresses for authorization
> purposes. SAML is the standard way of accessing publisher resources
> online, of course.)
> -peter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message