Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54606 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2009 16:07:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2009 16:07:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 99383 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 16:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99342 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 16:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99333 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2009 16:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_MID,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.113.244.95] (HELO mta.grupoitnet.com) (217.113.244.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:07:18 +0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=itnet.es; b=bQ8tDq/0clY/cPIJy5e5JPKfuco0xoE3bLLf0NFzIxmsv+KVTn93PigxY3DYThGKDp1RC1+7hloMgengGbnNVKNwPalIGTl2PQuTkydhANGeQGlM5PsYj9yEtIi67Tpo; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; Received: (qmail 30009 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2009 18:32:22 +0200 Received: from 73.red-83-50-180.dynamicip.rima-tde.net (HELO eitnet121) (83.50.180.73) by ociomedia.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2009 18:32:21 +0200 From: "Ruben" To: Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:05:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_016A_01CA2FE5.D22BC2E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: Acov1Q4fIYqvhLkSRkmnYN6hxkENGw== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <20090907160727.80BE972488D@athena.apache.org> Subject: [users@httpd] Mod_Evasive & Mod_Deflate: Apache running under NAS ------=_NextPart_000_016A_01CA2FE5.D22BC2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all folks! =20 Its my first message to the mailing list, so excuse me if Im posting on wrong place. I have worked with Apache since 4 years ago, almost always = with version 2.X. So I have a little experience with this great web Server. =20 Lately, Im introducing NAS tecnologies with free software like Openfiler = to reduce the load of local hard drives. My last experiment is: =20 One NAS running on IP A One VPS (Centos 5.3 under Virtuozzo Linux) with Apache running on IP B =20 VPS has a mapped folder to NAS (IP B) and Apache is configure to work = with this mapped folder called /data. The performance is good until now but I have a very big doubt about mod_deflate and mod_expires. Maybe Im = totally wrong about that and I apologize, but I think that, mod_deflate and mod_expire don=92t running when data is not =93local=94. I do some Basic = test: =20 - one .htaccess on DocumentRoot with rules about deflate and expires - directly on Virtual host configuration =20 No one with success. When I run Yslow Firefox Plugin, it don=92t detects compression or expire. So the only difference with this experiment (NAS+Apache) and the other host of my net (Apache+Local Drives) is NAS. Maybe is NAS the cause of my problem? Or is not related? =20 Thanks to all! =20 Rub=E9n Ortiz=20 =20 More info: Apache version: Server version: Apache/2.2.3 Server built: Jul 14 2009 06:02:39 SO: Centos 5.3 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_016A_01CA2FE5.D22BC2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all folks!

 

Its my first message to the mailing list, so excuse = me if Im posting on =A0wrong place. I have worked with Apache since 4 years ago, = almost always with version 2.X. So I have a little experience with this great web = Server.

 

Lately, Im introducing NAS tecnologies with free = software like Openfiler to reduce the load of local hard drives. My last = experiment is:

 

One NAS running on IP A

One VPS (Centos 5.3 under Virtuozzo Linux) with = Apache running on IP B

 

VPS has a mapped folder to NAS (IP B) and Apache is configure to work with this mapped folder called /data. The performance = is good until now but I have a very big doubt about mod_deflate and mod_expires. = Maybe Im totally wrong about that and I apologize, but I think that, = mod_deflate and mod_expire don’t running when data is not “local”. I = do some Basic test:

 

-          one .htaccess on = DocumentRoot with rules about deflate and expires

-          directly on Virtual host configuration

 

No one with success. When I run Yslow Firefox Plugin, = it don’t detects compression or expire. So the only difference with this = experiment (NAS+Apache) and the other host of my net (Apache+Local Drives) is NAS. = Maybe is NAS the cause of my problem? Or is not = related?

 

Thanks to all!

 

Rub=E9n = Ortiz 

 

More info:

Apache version: Server version: Apache/2.2.3 Server = built:=A0=A0 Jul 14 2009 06:02:39

SO: Centos 5.3

 

------=_NextPart_000_016A_01CA2FE5.D22BC2E0--