httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Florian S." <flo....@gmx.net>
Subject [users@httpd] mod_proxy: Status-Flags vs. 'Hard-Disabling' for BalancerMembers
Date Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:31:11 GMT
Hi all!

I have a short question: What ist the advantage of the 'disabled'-flag
in:

	BalancerMember http://1.2.3.5:8080 status=+D route=2

since it would be as easy to disable it with a hash-comment (or strip it
completely):

	#BalancerMember http://1.2.3.5:8080 route=2

Sounds more 'safe' to me ;-). Are there any issues with that? (Caching,
active connections, etc..) What's the difference? Or should I use the
'stopped'-flag in addition?
The backend should be disabled for for example maintaining purposes.

Kind regards:
	Florian Schröder


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message