Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46992 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2009 14:43:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2009 14:43:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 91121 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2009 14:43:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91103 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2009 14:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91094 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2009 14:43:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:43:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jjhudak@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.149] (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.92.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:43:04 +0000 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so312062qwf.48 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=U+CoxaEGsvKoYOcp2YX3dZt+w977VSfVECWk2Hgrw6o=; b=wRajJzywbH9KuRAbBtItn2chjQW0hCwIQvHuTBZf1essW602ekwx4NOI/QZdtYYwQT IWjoGuThur0k0TuXquKu1zLIA2Iv1pojAPH/cApqsACvX+d+H0wEfUzBeZCo+39YGXDJ cbbG3lrYfQwi8XjpVb2Fq7dQDsVOrZaLeRXNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qYN9iFGe9ZXo3nS6M1Qkvubh0L2gpu2n+MXh8Fm49/8w9RvyH5YRNq7mxtgtkTrU6V +czkb7KslZPG7wYGNweAGOeiWKMFl6QXQEgcvzpGkUJTp8hMxfoFMQmz9Ahzo1WfmxGQ sk8oPOMLZ1CBQ3KXUP2VW6Wg59K+u6lBzpivw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.11 with SMTP id m11mr1284410qcl.96.1236350559864; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:42:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <49B01DE8.3080009@ice-sa.com> <20090305192510.802301C354E@espphotography.com> <49B03302.80004@rowe-clan.net> <4df3a1330903051356l3a833355yd04fb3fc0be00851@mail.gmail.com> <49B04AF2.6050806@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:42:39 -0500 Message-ID: <9287b2d20903060642j41e26f45h6990dc86cd039117@mail.gmail.com> From: John Hudak To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364270bcf12c9d0464744b3e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache port help --0016364270bcf12c9d0464744b3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Seems to me this whole rant got started because someone who appears to be well indoctrinated in the M$ world thought that Apache was somehow a lesser program because it did have a mechanism to support port sharing. That is a discussion for the developers thread and if you feel strongly about it, the= n you can devote your time to push that concept. As I see it, this is not a new concept. In the 2000's the buzz word is 'virtualization'....It depends on the design goals of the program as to what concept needs to be pushed. Sharing a port is yet another level of abstractions/indirection that most likely can decrease performance. (e.d. somthing M$ has not been overly concerned about, just look at Vista). There are also security issues (something else M$...well you get the picture). Am glad the OP solved the issue. -J On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Flowering Weeds wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > Call me crazy...but if apache were written in .NET, wouldn't that mak= e > > > it a Windows-only product? > > > > > > > > > > > > No http.sys makes it Windows only > but so does WSA commands now! > > Anyway a lot of .NET (CLR really) is > in Mono and the many Silverlight .NET > usage versions for most OS browsers. > > Remember C# is a standard now > and .NET is Microsft's version of it! > > FYI > > > > ------------------------------ > Windows Live=99: Keep your life in sync. Check it out. > --0016364270bcf12c9d0464744b3e Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Seems to me this whole rant got started because someone who appears to be w= ell indoctrinated in the M$ world thought that Apache was somehow a lesser = program because it did have a mechanism to support port sharing.=A0 That is= a discussion for the developers thread and if you feel strongly about it, = then you can devote your time to push that concept.=A0 As I see it, this is= not a new concept.=A0 In the 2000's the buzz word is 'virtualizati= on'....It depends on the design goals of the program as to what concept= needs to be pushed.=A0=A0 Sharing a port is yet another level of abstracti= ons/indirection that most likely can decrease performance.=A0 (e.d. somthin= g M$ has not been overly concerned about, just look at Vista).=A0 There are= also security issues (something else=A0 M$...well you get the picture). Am glad the OP solved the issue.
-J


On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Flowering Weeds <floweringweeds@hotmail.com&g= t; wrote:

=A0
> >>
> >
> > Call me crazy...but if apache were= written in .NET, wouldn't that make
> > it a Windows-only pro= duct?
> >
> >
> >

=A0
No http.sys makes it Windows only
but so does WSA commands now!
=A0
Anyway a lot of .NET (CLR really) is
in Mono and the many Silverlight .NET
usage versions for most OS browsers.
=A0
Remember C# is a standard now
and .NET is Microsft's version of it!
=A0
FYI

=A0
=A0

Windows Live=99: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.

--0016364270bcf12c9d0464744b3e--