Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10279 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2009 16:56:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2009 16:56:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 24968 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2009 16:56:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 24947 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2009 16:56:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 24938 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2009 16:56:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:56:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO opensolaris.local) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:56:16 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (opensolaris.local [127.0.0.1]) by opensolaris.local (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n23GuOP9020581 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:56:25 GMT Message-ID: <49AD6138.8000006@webthing.com> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:56:24 +0000 From: Nick Kew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org References: <22297260.post@talk.nabble.com> <22308224.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <22308224.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Re: Is there a known Header limit in mod_jk (or bug)? fredk2 wrote: > Hi, > > I kept on testing with the attributes max_packet_size and packetSize (in > worker.properties and server.xml) and it appears to fix the large header > problem. > > Does this mean that all the headers together have to fit into a buffer which > size is set by max_packet_size? You'd be better off posting this in a tomcat forum. The fixes you made are in tomcat, and mod_jk is tomcat's baby. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org