Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36559 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2009 20:53:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2009 20:53:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 34070 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2009 20:53:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 33823 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2009 20:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 33814 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2009 20:53:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:53:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of glen.j.barber@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.18] (HELO mail-fx0-f18.google.com) (209.85.220.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:52:57 +0000 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3353245fxm.0 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:52:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VIFaDGIDcxZAX18uCgqvoQZdQNW9EbPNZ8RF9ckKwsI=; b=aSJ0vbQ5HEkLg5vpVSAbseqb0S1sRQw8TEAKCGCB2qAGGeI9R8vmCK8WMAkO/uwBbl 2xHLb+frSkkttkGWhJ8AGwp8SVbsMPpTEnRQAei8RAroBZ01odjJALqK/Y5sPqVZdMfX 3MIOjEb1yepiiQ9JaM0GBCzqxf/1k4NRT0O3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s8/Kg0Pzne/Q/Ot6otxdlDJrO6vXysjNmaqny/po56Xi/zpiQLY0/nEosTnAyUJTHU OK88mcD0BRFLF2sAnANAkfjRXtvl5TWqe7dWkHHPwuO/QBdlfgE1QIuS+zjtz3FKb4gH mNQAQ6rxvvFAqUziWNqiK+YZwezD+ODvj7NQY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.209 with SMTP id v17mr2532707far.6.1234558355541; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:52:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1F2B02B194D7EA4D811573D1BE9FB013018BD543@FMD3VS011.fda.gov> References: <1F2B02B194D7EA4D811573D1BE9FB013018BD543@FMD3VS011.fda.gov> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902131252p2b89d685n2ca9cfef9f9432e2@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] nOOb question about patching... On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Griffith, Michael * wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm not clear on this basic issue, and I'm looking for someone to clear it > up for me. If I have Apache 2.2.6 installed and configured, and I need to > upgrade to 2.2.9, can I do that with the patch command, or do I need to > actually download the new binary? Running on solaris under a zone -- the > entire apache install is in one directory instead of the usual /etc/ /var > install. > Generally, when doing version upgrades, it is a Good Idea (tm) to uninstall the current version, and install the new version (via source, binary, whatever you wish). Patching, IMHO, is only really "safe" when adding/removing functionality. Regards, -- Glen Barber --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org