Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3894 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2009 13:28:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2009 13:28:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 61538 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2009 13:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61525 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2009 13:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61516 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2009 13:28:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:28:31 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:28:22 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LLHP7-0001A9-O2 for users@httpd.apache.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:28:01 -0800 Message-ID: <21372301.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:28:01 -0800 (PST) From: Henk Fictorie To: users@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1BCA52CF5845E543B4B81AAFEF2AFD7905F243EF@LONSEXC01.gta.travel.lcl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: henk.fictorie@kpn.com References: <1BCA52CF5845E543B4B81AAFEF2AFD7905F243EF@LONSEXC01.gta.travel.lcl> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Isolating slow and fast connections using apache/modjk Gerhardus.Geldenhuis wrote: > > > My question really is where I should be doing the isolation to protect > slow stacks. I am not sure whether I can achieve this in modjk or > whether I should rather be running separate apache instances for tomcat > stack A and B. I considered using virtual hosts but I believe they would > still share the overall amount of threads as defined above. > > You probably should have a look at the connection_pool... settings for individual workers, see http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-users%40httpd--Isolating-slow-and-fast-connections-using-apache-modjk-tp21249424p21372301.html Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org