Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18769 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2008 02:20:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2008 02:20:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 88846 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2008 02:20:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88825 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2008 02:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88816 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2008 02:20:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:20:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mjtice@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.21] (HELO mail-qy0-f21.google.com) (209.85.221.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:20:03 +0000 Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3612781qyk.0 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:19:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=RdFlaxkg55Xt2raIMv5tdWIkKFaZ8w2DQRQFfqHw7Pg=; b=NvfdgGwSX7H64BJ101q1KPtbIwEUWoGyCwo6o2zBJ0cYuWzJV+F9ern8ImIWlZs34P 3R9rc36hTSrRBV0Jl1+Xt5h3cDoMr8TWVuEDB5WZzdQnr1Va2UOwqQaaLnG2Ulof6TVD 2dCGL7eBDaffycwf0fFfqSQFtxvBgnssX9VAs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=jE56nHXJA5u5QhSqdSTNXOOdKWMjrXZqIMSCeT5W9LjiPoqR2sMWeU0LvKrBBgdGGM wnc7Bv8XwIEp5cfWdZYeaOK0iTbPjtmXrdJkYN0RSlIM6nE3aZPAs5NEn06JUsm9pNV/ jn8XPxpNnLG1amovSD57km3IbDGSuLUYNmfY8= Received: by 10.215.15.15 with SMTP id s15mr146883qai.375.1229480380505; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.215.15.21 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:19:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:19:40 -0700 From: "Matthew Tice" To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: htcacheclean ignoring -l (limit)? In-Reply-To: <87r647eswu.fsf@poir9.raleigh.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_94921_4525241.1229480380487" References: <4947E0C5.9040304@gmail.com> <87r647eswu.fsf@poir9.raleigh.ibm.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_94921_4525241.1229480380487 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Dan Poirier wrote: > Have you tried -t? It looks like htcacheclean just counts the sizes of > the files, but if you have a lot of empty directories, that might be > taking up some space too. -t looks like it would clean that up. > I thought so too - I tried -t but I still have the same problem. Matt ------=_Part_94921_4525241.1229480380487 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Dan Poirier <poirier@pobox.com> wrote:
Have you tried -t?  It looks like htcacheclean just counts the sizes of
the files, but if you have a lot of empty directories, that might be
taking up some space too.  -t looks like it would clean that up.

I thought so too - I tried -t but I still have the same problem.

Matt 
------=_Part_94921_4525241.1229480380487--