Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <493E1D94.5010902@ice-sa.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:26:12 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= <aw@ice-sa.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@httpd.apache.org
References: <20880100.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <493BC4B1.8020603@ice-sa.com>	 <20884799.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <20892178.post@talk.nabble.com>	 <493CF647.9080009@ice-sa.com>
 <20906991.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <1404e5910812082146q53603af6p3036c2bd6e08d861@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1404e5910812082146q53603af6p3036c2bd6e08d861@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Re: Re: Re[users@httpd] direct Issues (Migrating
 from 1.3 to 2.0)

Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Chris Graham <chrisg@warpspeed.com.au> wrote:
> 
>> So is this a bug (as it worked as I need it to in 1.3), or just an
>> incompatable change? [or a bug that's been fixed from 1.3?]
> 
> IMO there's no reason both your rules shouldn't loop.
> 
Is that the same as saying that there is a reason both rules should loop ?

I think what Eric is saying is that it should have looped in 1.3 also.
Don't take this to mean that I did not say that it should not have 
looped, though.
;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org