Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2249 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 15:00:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 15:00:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 5953 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2008 15:00:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5932 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2008 15:00:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5921 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2008 15:00:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:00:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aganguly01@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.185] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:59:25 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so4300881mue.4 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=zyU2P5JtWXoAOeyLbBsfeU8IZv/4cJjHWOQX5kFo+pI=; b=gp0vPYy80MHXyaDWbHKl5ioY3koK9Mjpj4KvwPHhnFrN/ts0YJ35Xsy1sZIR9PXxUM/37OCRRA8xvtLIHUEYRSmhR4kst+hP03VUk56CzWOGnBszwe/c8O4mPfis0VsWlT21W5Ig+phU0cCNEB0PTZAuPSdnxF6i8n08ocoTIJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=C2j3O3iHBujnA0nFm9vtJQzNUIyQukYh6891FHAG3DqpqPoCsPq+Se9zILZn3KqvqMeWWunpjWriX+lm8ZNRBaq1BzAbv3n5LPQ7HgZILnwS0fBxXEupbdsdZL5NBtglhit0eJFG3QDXwXSpb2D822DTVuPgUrWo2i1ZuhMrxOE= Received: by 10.78.204.7 with SMTP id b7mr26526603hug.38.1205420360568; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.131.18 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2ae67e000803130759q4342be69yed8e66bbbe9afd15@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:29:19 +0530 From: "Arnab Ganguly" To: users@httpd.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_8909_7440966.1205420360558" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [users@httpd] Memory leak issue with ap_get_client_block() ------=_Part_8909_7440966.1205420360558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi All, I am getting a memory leak issue in Apache 2.2.8 on Red-Hat 5.0. I tried out the following options 1) MaxRequestPerChild settings to non zero 2)I was allocating memory by using apr_palloc from the request pool but later I replaced to normal malloc and added a clean handler in apr_pool_cleanup_run. Above didn't resulted any improvements.I may be doing something major mistake in my module any help would be highly appreciated.Just curious any issue with the ap_get_client_block() function.I am using this function many times so can it be a problem and what is the work around for this. Thanks in advance. -A ------=_Part_8909_7440966.1205420360558 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi All,
I am getting a memory leak issue in Apache 2.2.8 on Red-Hat 5.0.
I tried out the following options
1)  MaxRequestPerChild settings to non zero
2)I was  allocating memory by using  apr_palloc  from the  request pool but later I replaced to normal malloc and added a clean handler in apr_pool_cleanup_run.

Above didn't resulted any improvements.I may be doing something major mistake in my module any help would be highly appreciated.Just curious any  issue with the ap_get_client_block() function.I am using this function many times so can it be a problem and what is the work around for this.
Thanks in advance.
-A

------=_Part_8909_7440966.1205420360558--