Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65687 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2008 11:36:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2008 11:36:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 92850 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2008 11:36:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92833 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2008 11:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92821 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2008 11:36:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:36:26 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of npeelman@cfl.rr.com designates 75.180.132.121 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.180.132.121] (HELO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (75.180.132.121) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:36:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (really [24.175.203.43]) by cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20080107113604.UNAO26118.cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com@[192.168.1.5]> for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:36:04 +0000 Message-ID: <47820EA2.60302@cfl.rr.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:36:02 -0500 From: Norman Peelman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org References: <19ffc3250801062231o17d60e86oef45678c4a44315f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19ffc3250801062231o17d60e86oef45678c4a44315f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Will Apache still work with Windows SP1? Nir Ofek wrote: > Hi there, > > Thanks for anyone who might be willing and able to help me (me = a > total Apache novice) with this question. > > The Apache documentation states > > that for running Apache HTTP for windows XP, I should download SP2. > However, I have SP1, and want to avoid the risk of installing SP2. > > *Any idea if Apache will still run well with SP1, or if indeed > downloading SP2 is critical for Apache?* > > Many thanks, > > Nir I was running it just fine on a sp1 XP. It was an Apache2 but could not tell you which one. I'm sure it's security related as to why they say 'should'. -- Norman Registered Linux user #461062 --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org