httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Svend Sorensen" <>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] vs.
Date Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:18:41 GMT
On 10/19/07, Mark Drummond wrote:
> I have Apache sitting in front of some WebSphere app servers. So far, we
> have always used virtual hosts in Apache to give each application it's own
> FQDN. So we have , etc. This is leading to a
> (small) proliferation of FQDNs, and now I am wondering if it is better to
> have a single FQDN and use URIs to separate the applications. In other
> words, going to, So now I am trying to
> figure out the pros and cons, and looking for some input on how others are
> doing this.
> The way I see it, separate FQDNs for every application require more
> administration. Because we are doing SSL everywhere I have to use IP based
> virtual hosts so I'm creating new interfaces and allocating new IP addresses
> for every new application. And then every app requires it's own certificate.

Using a wildcard certificate (* would be an alternative to
IP-based vhosts.

The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
   "   from the digest:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message