Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yvo.vandoorn@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.146.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=MsFwnsY90LHeajKo/T885Mc0xfczou6oLh6aqNiq6bjdwV0GtKFE4s5O/hGCIdWD0lIoNvQAKVOcYPPYRf//Qj4gAIO0NL0M1hIa7Jyj9lh8CaOVMJPI+JxCE11DVGSQzd9ihBstG7ZxtttPtAsSfRIX778QHBqkNbtjQeavCYk=
Message-ID: <740f716a0706070106u43816df1n8113513785ac02f8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:06:24 -0700
From: "Yvo van Doorn" <yvo.vandoorn@gmail.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <e498c1660706050623u5ec0c915iae6d889e4f4edeec@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2ae67e000706030849i12a914b1jae05f9a333d7633f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6ed6382b0706040358p4dc330a6l7869a1d27ef326f3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2ae67e000706040846s655eeab7x591e2dc35d889b0b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e498c1660706040854l6e0ef8f3v43952b67a62af388@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2ae67e000706040920m23d92a44iec12929e38eeb5f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e498c1660706041046w6d1a8b31vf734b23f6b98cd91@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2ae67e000706042127u45d64cb9jdcb7954ffeb4432a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e498c1660706050623u5ec0c915iae6d889e4f4edeec@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon

On 6/5/07, Joshua Slive <joshua@slive.ca> wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Arnab Ganguly <aganguly01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  I am replacing Apache with NES(Sun Web Server).NES is pretty old.So I
> > wanted to use Apache with single process and multi threaded web server
> > similar to NES.
>
> To be honest, that doesn't sound like a very good justification. Just
> because NES does it that way doesn't mean you want Apache to do it
> that way.
>
> >
> >  Now I have used the mod_status also.The new process launched shows to be
> > active while the old daemon doesn't show anything.
>
> Interesting. Have you checked the error log to see if apache is
> restarting because it received a signal? Perhaps you have a log
> rotation script restarting apache?
>
> Or perhaps the old process got stuck processing something. You could
> try attaching to it with a debugger and figuring out what it is doing:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
>
> Joshua.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>

If you want a single process multi threaded server perhaps you should
take a look at lighttpd, what others have said mpm_worker isn't
designed to do what you are trying to do. In the mean time I'll
continue embracing Apache :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org