Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ldwraith@xmission.com
 designates 166.70.13.231 as permitted sender)
From: "Glen Vickers" <ldwraith@xmission.com>
To: <users@httpd.apache.org>
References: <005201c79518$bd0c92a0$3725b7e0$@com>
 <09878FA2-A91F-46A2-B0F8-59A2DDD33321@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <09878FA2-A91F-46A2-B0F8-59A2DDD33321@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 00:51:41 -0600
Message-ID: <006001c7952b$29873e50$7c95baf0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AceVKoLcK4jaDgWcSqq+zCVPvfDeXQAAGvyw
Content-Language: en-us
Received-SPF: neutral (mgr1.xmission.com: 199.104.125.190 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of xmission.com) client-ip=199.104.125.190;
 envelope-from=ldwraith@xmission.com; helo=xaiolin;
Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Resolve issue

Hey Glen,

On May 12, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Glen Vickers wrote:

> Someone please tell me what I'm missing.  I need to get paid! lol

That's great, can we have some too? lol

> Heres my resolv.conf
>
>
>
> search buddistpalm.net
>
> search sillumutah.com
>
> search sillumutah.net
>
> nameserver 192.168.1.10
>
> nameserver 198.60.22.2 (ISP name server)

Are these two in agreement over the zone data?  Do you have your own  
definitions for those domains in your own DNS, or does it just query  
the root servers for that like (I assume) your ISP's DNS would?

 From here:

[sctemme@graymalkin] sctemme $ dig a buddistpalm.net.
<..>
;; ANSWER SECTION:
buddistpalm.net.        3582    IN      CNAME   shaolin.buddistpalm.net.
shaolin.buddistpalm.net. 3582   IN      A       199.104.125.190
<..>
[sctemme@graymalkin] sctemme $ dig a sillumutah.com
<..>
;; ANSWER SECTION:
sillumutah.com.         3600    IN      CNAME   shaolin.sillumutah.com.
shaolin.sillumutah.com. 3600    IN      A       199.104.125.190
<..>

sillumutah.net does not resolve.

>  Here's my hosts file
>
>
>
> 192.168.1.10       shaolin  buddistpalm.net sillumutah.com  
> sillumutah.net localhost.localdomain localhost

What has precedence on your client machine?

Seems to work OK from here, if Sil Lum Utah is indeed a club of  
serious looking dudes in pajamas sporting hardware, and the other one  
has Tigger holding up an Under Construction sign.

Your Apache config looks good, although you didn't have to post the  
whole thing. The two VirtualHost declarations mean that all requests  
with a corresponding Host: header end up at the respective vhost, and  
requests that don't have a (matching) Host: header tend to land at  
the top one.

How the client got to your server is really between it and the DNS,  
or it and /etc/hosts if that has precedence. Apache has nothing to do  
with that, it just responds to whatever arrives on its doorstep,  
according to how the incoming requests express their destination  
(using the Host: header).

S.


-- 
Sander Temme
sctemme@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF


Thanks for that.  I know that hosts has precedence for now.  And yes I have
the zone data up on my machine correctly.  The .net not resolving is a host
issue with the source I bought the domain at.  I'm not too worried about
that part yet.  So why is it that you guys get the proper content on the
sillumutah.com and everyone around here that I've tried through including
the proxy I've tried don't get the site?  I'm not sure why that is.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org