Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of kclair@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=MJQwZTsmWIq9mOgPCewX34YPuR4PhrmDasvJga6xY+7guCOT/6NRv6Z0i+yej5pI8IHdJfChWJsb882K62gxtJFqLXG4YIVZ3t9dbkhPfpY8Iv6+vxjMTjqaPFwrn6qfuDM2tveURyPS0ZUzu36B0LTTE7OJ4S2QWMu3iBluSuU=
Message-ID: <dff375270612140804i3de12f81q619e8cdda450f417@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:04:01 -0600
From: "K. Clair" <kclair@gmail.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org, dev@apr.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <740f716a0612132349w7962c8bel414f43d00c634d8a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <dff375270612122122j675a5469g54281290a6441482@mail.gmail.com>
	 <740f716a0612132349w7962c8bel414f43d00c634d8a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
on the same machine.

I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as
with 2.0.59.  Again, all of this was done on the same system.

Has anyone been able to compile 2.0.59 with the --with-dbm=gdbm
configure option?

-Kristina

On 12/14/06, Yvo van Doorn <yvo.vandoorn@gmail.com> wrote:
> What version of gdbm is installed? Was it perhaps removed in a clean up of
> the machine? I know under Debian deborphan always wants to remove
> libgdbm-dev
>
>
> On 12/12/06, K. Clair <kclair@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59.  We have a
> > standard configure line that we have been using for the entire 2.0.x
> > release of apache:
> >
> > ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-proxy
> > --disable-proxy-connect --disable-proxy-ftp --enable-mods-shared=all
> > --with-dbm=gdbm --without-berkeley-db --enable-module-so --enable-ssl
> > --enable-suexec --with-suexec-docroot=/home/XXXhidden
> > --with-suexec-userdir=. --with-suexec-uidmin=100
> > --with-suexec-gidmin=100
> --with-suexec-safepath="/bin:/usr/bin"
> > --with-suexec-caller=www
> >
> > This has compiled with no problem for every apache version up until
> > 2.0.59.  The make error I am now seeing is (I included the line just
> > before the error in case it is relevant):
> > /home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc
> > -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
> > -Wmissing-declarations -pthread    -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT
> > -D_GNU_SOURCE -DAP_DEBUG -DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/apr/include
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/apr-util/include -I.
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/os/unix
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd- 2.0.59/server/mpm/prefork
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/modules/http
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/modules/filters
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/modules/proxy
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/include
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd- 2.0.59/modules/generators
> > -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/server -I/usr/include/openssl
> > -I/usr/kerberos/include -I/home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/modules/dav/main
> > -export-dynamic    -o htpasswd  htpasswd.lo   -lssl -lcrypto
> > -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lcom_err -lk5crypto -lresolv
> > -ldl -lz /home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/pcre/libpcre.la
> > /home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la -lexpat
> > /home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la -lrt -lm -lcrypt
> > -lnsl -lpthread -ldl
> >
> >
> /home/sys/src/httpd-2.0.59/srclib/apr-util/.libs/libaprutil-0.so:
> > undefined reference to `apr_dbm_type_gdbm'
> >
> > I am compiling apache on the same system that it was previously
> > compiled on, and I don't think anything significant has changed about
> > the setup otherwise.
> >
> > I read the changelog for all the releases between 2.0.55 and 2.0.59
> > but could find nothing related to dbm/gdbm.  Help? :)
> >
> > -Kristina
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more
> info.
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> >    "   from the digest:
> users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org