httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joshua Slive" <jos...@slive.ca>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2
Date Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:03:48 GMT
On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com> wrote:
> What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on
> httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2?
>
> Thanks.
>
> usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so
> usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so
> usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so
> usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_cache.so

Use 2.2.  There are few good reasons to use 2.0 over 2.2.  The upgrade
is very easy.  And mod_cache and mod_disk_cache are vastly better in
2.2.  mod_mem_cache probably isn't perfectly stable in either version,
and mod_file_cache hasn't changed much since 1.3.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message