httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Aldrich <>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Caching large amounts of small images... the best way?
Date Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:27:33 GMT
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 6/27/06, Forrest Aldrich <> wrote:
>> This appears to be experimental.
> I don't believe mod_cache/mod_disk_cache is experimental in 2.2.2.  It
> is in earlier versions, but I've already recommended you stay away
> from those.
>> How would an approach like this compare to a product such as Squid (in
>> terms of use).  Obviously Squid is very much more specialized and
>> requires resources to scale properly.
> I haven't used squid's caching, so I can't compare.  But a big
> advantage of mod_cache is that it can be used on the origin server
> itself -- no need to put a proxy in front.  This should reduce the
> load and complexity signficantly.  (It can also be used on a proxy, if
> you want a multi-tiered architecture.)
> mod_disk_cache should give you speeds that are better than apache
> httpd's static file access speeds.  In other words, it will be WAY
> faster than anything that requires database access.
> Joshua.

Are there some docs on mod_disk_cache - examples of implementation, etc. 
(beyond the description on the website).


The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
   "   from the digest:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message