Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60113 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2006 21:16:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2006 21:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 20875 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2006 21:16:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20862 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2006 21:16:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20850 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2006 21:16:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:16:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of simonwerner@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.197] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:16:47 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so176177nzh for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:16:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZaoeSN0rhTGIVpAZQUfqLB+hjLCzHxRnzFU8lOLlaAHyw3h7xsxLbles8OkFQZ5PkEEaClMiE2dyNnPE1//3MZiUQW/ysY/lTd3GOOrX5yf8kEEwNCWAQG87GaKrxSp5a1HWnftE8U1XewPS9Nu0x8PVlTGZ9e+vnbBqjjrLkNA= Received: by 10.36.74.19 with SMTP id w19mr2719588nza; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.66.8 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f756dde0604141416o2f8a6385xb9c93af85bdadb30@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:16:26 +0200 From: "Simon Werner" To: users@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <8C29B2F93BAE9047A906EF6D6F9C5D4301C28A4E@exchange2k301.gaia.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8C29B2F93BAE9047A906EF6D6F9C5D4301C28A4E@exchange2k301.gaia.fr> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problems with JS, IE 6.0 and mod_deflate X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thanks a lot for all the advice. Unfortunately we are limited to using only IE so we cannot implement other browsers. The mod_filter looks promising, I will try that. Thanks, Simon On 4/14/06, Axel-St=E9phane SMORGRAV wrote: > IE does not particularly like compressed CSS and JS and exhibits exactly = the behaviour you describe when you download a compressed CSS or a compress= ed JS which compressed size is less than 5 KB (?? not sure about the number= , but if memory serves me right it corresponds to some Windows registry set= ting). Compressing plain text or HTML works well. > > In my view you have several choices: > > 1. If you really need to compress CSS and JS responses because most are b= ig, but you have a few that are below the limit, you can pad those that are= known to cause the problem. > > 2. If most CSS and JS are small, you can choose not to compress this kind= of contents. > > 3. You can use mod_filter to execute the DEFLATE output-filter, you can c= reate conditions on the types of contents you want to compress, and even on= the size of each content. You can for example choose to compress CSS and J= S only if the size exceeds a certain value. > > mod_filter is an Apache 2.1/2.2 module but can relatively easily be compi= led for Apache 2.0 > > You state that you have the problem even though you do not compress JS. I= do not however know about any other issue with IE that would cause the pro= blem you describe, and the problem is definitely not in Apache. I have been= using compression a little in 2.0.47, and heavily in 2.0.49 and 2.0.54, an= d never seen the exact problem you describe caused by anything else that IE= /CSS/JS. Of course there may be other problems related to timing, scripts e= xpecting certain variables to exist that are defined in another java script= that has not yet initialised etc., but I doubt it is in your case. > > -ascs > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org