Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53715 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2005 14:13:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2005 14:13:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 15646 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2005 14:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15633 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2005 14:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15622 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2005 14:12:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:12:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO asgard.webthing.com) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:12:51 -0800 Received: from asgard (asgard [192.168.10.2]) by asgard.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F3B64638 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:13:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Kew Organization: WebThing Ltd To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:13:40 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510311413.43182.nick@webthing.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Connecting C++ server with Apache: AJP? X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Monday 31 October 2005 13:58, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Hi, > > What is the (best) way to connect a C++ server with Apache? What's the language got to do with it? Use whatever protocol your backend supports. > AJP looks usable, but I'm not sure if it's the right way. Apache's proxy framework is one option. DBD is another. > CGI is no option for performance reasons. Have you benchmarked it? Most backends (eg anything using servlets) impose a far bigger overhead than CGI. > There is no open source FastCGI implementation available (it seems). Really? -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org