Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84582 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2005 19:26:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 19:26:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 10069 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2005 19:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 9172 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2005 19:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 9159 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2005 19:25:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:25:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [198.76.24.140] (HELO WSTEXCH00.westminster.polycom.com) (198.76.24.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:26:06 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:25:16 -0600 Message-ID: <74297C5A6F930B4CB40D33BD127E882A77EB74@WSTEXCH00.westminster.polycom.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [users@httpd] why would a GET consistently take 10 seconds? Thread-Index: AcW3zfnI6nNH+ammSE2PPQNoIesjaQAARePQ From: "Bradley, Todd" To: , X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] why would a GET consistently take 10 seconds? X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joshua Slive wrote: > I would still suspect DNS. Check your config for Allow and=20 > Deny statements and make sure they they use only "all" or an=20 > IP address -- nothing else. Thank you thank you thank you! I checked our Allow statements and found that we had several that looked like this: Allow from from all Once I changed them to the much nicer looking... Allow from all ...the problem went away. So my guess is Apache was trying to do a hostname lookup for host "from". I have no idea how our Allow statements got to be like this or why we never noticed until recently. But I really appreciate your nudge in the right directions. If you're ever in the Denver area, I owe you a cold beverage of your choice. Thanks, Todd. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org