Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36149 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2005 12:33:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2005 12:33:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 73771 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2005 12:33:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73755 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2005 12:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73742 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2005 12:33:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:33:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [128.104.17.198] (HELO awl.doit.wisc.edu) (128.104.17.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:33:59 -0700 Received: from awl.doit.wisc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by awl.doit.wisc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7GCXZe2023908 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:33:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (cdunigan@localhost) by awl.doit.wisc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id j7GCXZSW023904 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:33:35 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: awl.doit.wisc.edu: cdunigan owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:33:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Craig Dunigan To: users@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <43010C10.10306@ssd.loral.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Multiple apache instances X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Now that I look closer at your original message, I should have been able to tell that from the paths. As Joshua already said, apachectl responds to all or nearly all of the same switches that httpd does, so use the appropriate combination to control the separate instances. My main point was not to write your own control script when a well-tested one comes with Apache. -- Craig Dunigan IS Technical Services Specialist Middleware - EIS - DoIT University of Wisconsin, Madison opinions expressed are my own, not the University's On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Spike Burkhardt wrote: > Craig, > > thanks for the info. What I did forget to mention is that the > multiple instances are running from the same directory tree. > > spike > > Craig Dunigan wrote: > > >Each instance should already have its own control script, apachectl, > >in the bin directory, with paths specific to that instance. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org