Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99509 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2005 21:17:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2005 21:17:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 96431 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2005 21:17:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96418 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2005 21:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96383 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2005 21:17:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of wheakory@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.201 as permitted sender) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:17:14 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so130068nzp for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:17:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Er5sQY9KrOVBCZL6ca0Wbhln90d/YdeZ8HV9tVH0CfKGlFTtEnMwiVUhJkSYUZPTHcC+2LzlF3NoG3XE0lcdSq3bV2H7UUOOfcpFXDWUEAKV2vzSxG3yGdXY4mVvJ24yrnLM58Q3FZFe8TcDI/o9SiWsujpWwBErBINKT9L4egI= Received: by 10.36.47.13 with SMTP id u13mr3713714nzu; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.3 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <886fff4905061414103308aafa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:10:24 -0600 From: Kory Wheatley Reply-To: Kory Wheatley To: users@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <886fff490506141258303836af@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0 Secure and non secure server X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N To bring the secure server down on one instance would the easiest way be commenting out #llisten 443 and then issuing a "apachectl graceful", and Vice versa for port 80? Can one instance have Vitural Server Hosting on port 80 but not on the Secure Server? Also it might be a nightmare to configure PHP on two separate instances, if you have the servers installed under different users. On 6/14/05, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 6/14/05, Kory Wheatley wrote: > > Question: > > > > Would it be better to setup Apache Secure Server and NON Secure Server > > on two separate configuration instances, or one just one instance? > > Would it be a performance hit to have it setup as two separate server > > instances? >=20 > It really depends on what you prefer to maintain. It is pretty-much > equivalent in terms of performance. If you have only one instance, > then you get a shared idle server pool, which could save a little > memory. But with two instances, you can tailor the necessary modules > for each server, which could save memory as well. Two instances is > probably a little more resilient, in that bringing down one > (accidentally or deliberately) will not affect the other. But it is > probably a little more of a hassel to configure. >=20 > Joshua. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org