Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21144 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 12:34:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 12:34:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12778 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2005 12:34:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12733 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2005 12:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12707 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2005 12:34:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_HTML,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from wip-ectls-mx3.wipro.com (HELO wip-ectls-mx3.wipro.com) (203.101.113.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 05:34:36 -0700 Received: from wip-ectls-mx3.wipro.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542E8224105 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:10 +0530 (IST) Received: from blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com (blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com [10.201.50.92]) by wip-ectls-mx3.wipro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498A1224017 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:10 +0530 (IST) Received: from BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com ([10.201.50.162]) by blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:10 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C566A6.357BD541" Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:09 +0530 Message-ID: <527712917C05904F91F46FADBBE0F90D0267E2@BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [users@httpd] RAM Allocation. Thread-Index: AcVQMtlUmys0AJVcTjaO3BSFX3yoTAWdBjjw From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2005 12:34:10.0124 (UTC) FILETIME=[35AFB8C0:01C566A6] X-Virus-Checked: Checked Subject: FW: [users@httpd] RAM Allocation. X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C566A6.357BD541 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, =0D I was away for quire some time. =0D Can anybody please help me in getting a solution for this issue ? =0D Thanks, Ravi. =0D -----Original Message----- From: ravi.muthukaruppan@wipro.com [mailto:ravi.muthukaruppan@wipro.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 04:17 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [users@httpd] RAM Allocation. Hi All, =0D I'm using Apache 1.3.28 on Solaris 8 loaded on Sun-Fire-280R server, having 2x1.2GHz CPU/ 6GB RAM. =0D Recently it happened twice that the the number of httpd processes went around 200, the Swap ( 4GB ) space got filled up and apache stopped serving requests. =0D At the same time, I observed that the total the physical RAM usage was low, which was 1.3 GB out of 6GB. =0D Is there a possibility that we can allocate more RAM to httpd processes so that swap is less used and apache serves more requests ? =0D Any help is highly appreciated. =0D Thanks. Ravi. Confidentiality Notice=0D The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. =0D Confidentiality Notice=0D The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C566A6.357BD541 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hi=0D All,
 
I was=0D away for quire some time.
 
Can=0D anybody please help me in getting a solution for this issue=0D ?
 
Thanks,
Ravi.
 

-----Original= Message-----
From:=0D ravi.muthukaruppan@wipro.com [mailto:ravi.muthukaruppan@wipro.com]=0D
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 04:17
To:=0D users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] RAM=0D Allocation.

Hi=0D All,
 
I'm using= Apache=0D 1.3.28 on Solaris 8 loaded on Sun-Fire-280R server, having 2x1.2GHz=0D CPU/ 6GB RAM.
 
Recently= it happened=0D twice that the the number of httpd processes went around 200, the= Swap  (=0D 4GB ) space got filled up and apache stopped serving=0D requests.
 
At the= same time, I=0D observed that the total the physical RAM usage was low, which was 1.3 GB= out of=0D 6GB.
 
Is there= a=0D possibility that we can allocate more RAM to httpd processes so that swap= is=0D less used and apache serves more requests ?
 
Any help= is highly=0D appreciated.
 
Thanks.
Ravi.


Confidentiality= Notice=0D

The information contained in this electronic message and any= =0D attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of= the=0D addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information.= =0D If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at= =0D Wipro or Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately
and destroy all copies of= this=0D message and any= attachments.


Confidentiality Notice

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C566A6.357BD541--