Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81800 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 17:11:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 17:11:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 19595 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 17:08:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19548 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 17:08:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19384 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2005 17:08:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from web25403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (HELO web25403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.12.10.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 02 May 2005 10:08:06 -0700 Received: (qmail 65883 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2005 17:06:09 -0000 Message-ID: <20050502170609.65881.qmail@web25403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [80.5.160.9] by web25403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 May 2005 18:06:09 BST Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:06:09 +0100 (BST) From: James Nicolson Reply-To: james@nicolson.biz To: users@httpd.apache.org, jslive@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked Subject: Re: [users@httpd] dynamic virtual hosts X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/vhosts/mass.html > >> >> I've read that many times.... I cant even get the >> simple configuration such as beneath working >> >> VirtualDocumentRoot /var/www/%0/htdocs >> VirtualScriptAlias /var/www/%0/cgi-bin >> >> so why does that not work??? my traditional vhost >> setup is as follows and that works fine.... why not >> the above? yet it will do whats below: >You need to look in the error log to see what that >problem is. this is what the error_log gives on each request [Mon May 02 18:01:15 2005] [debug] mod_proxy.c(418): Trying to run scheme_handler [Mon May 02 18:01:15 2005] [warn] proxy: No protocol handler was valid for the URL /. If you are using a DSO version of mod_proxy, make sure the proxy submodules are included in the configuration using LoadModule. >> I was wondering if there was a way to do it without >> symbolic links >You could perhaps create two name-based sections, one >with a "ServerAlias www.*" that has directives to catch that case, and >the other, listed first, that would catch the non-www case. But the >symlinks are simpler, and would recommend sticking with that. >>>>> > >> RewriteEngine on >>>>> > >> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^(TRACE|TRACK) >>>>> > >> RewriteRule .* - [F] >> >>> > >>> > >>> > This Rewrite stuff is unimportant and is only needed >>> > if you want to >>> > satisfy the whims of your vulnerability tester. >>> > > >> >> but if I dont have it I get a forbidden access >> message??? >That doesn't seem very likely. Are you absolutely >sure? These rules >have nothing to do with ordinary request serving. Well I just checked it and looks like your right.... I dont need that.... >Joshua. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org