Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36627 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2005 16:32:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 2005 16:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 78510 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2005 15:24:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 78485 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2005 15:24:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 78460 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2005 15:24:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from intra.demon.nl (HELO webpagina.nu) (82.161.102.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:24:07 -0700 Received: (qmail 1493 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2005 15:24:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (192.168.1.100) by webpagina.nu with SMTP; 20 Apr 2005 15:24:01 -0000 Message-ID: <42667410.7040005@webpagina.nu> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:24:00 +0200 From: Patrick Donker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org References: <8BD14BFBFD6D6E44803E3C3539E60F6A92D036@ssct-email.starkstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <8BD14BFBFD6D6E44803E3C3539E60F6A92D036@ssct-email.starkstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache/Domain Controller X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Leasure, James wrote: >Hey Pat, > >Thanks for the response. I don't want to turn this into a windows vs. >linux debate. I've heard that a million time...And, if I could I would. > >I'm low on the totum and just want some fire power to get this thing >cleaned up... > >Thanks, >James > >-----Original Message----- >From: Patrick Donker [mailto:list@webpagina.nu] >Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:11 AM >To: users@httpd.apache.org >Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache/Domain Controller > >Leasure, James wrote: > > > >>Hello All! >> >>I know is totally uncool to even ask, but can anyone point me to some >>docs, or tell me why you should not run Windows Apache service on a >>Window's primary domain controller? >> >>Thanks, >>James >> >> >> >> >Ahm...where should I start...Thats hard...Apache on Win is not adviced >to begin with, Win is unsafe so if your site gets hacked so is your pdc, >and the whole pdc is also not a very good model. This kinda summons it >up ;) Drop windows if you can! >sorry for this totally useless answer > >-P > > > James, Well, the tone of my msg was a bit flame alike, but basically it tells be the main reason. On the Apache site you can read an advisory for Win users, in short saying that there can be no guarantee that your site/server would be safe and/or stable. This is because of the common security issues that surround Windows. Imagine what would happen if things go wrong on your pdc! To be honest it is always a bad idea to run more services on a pdc, Apache or no Apache, for obvious reasons; if something goes wrong you loose your pdc, hence, Win network access. -Patrick --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org