Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90118 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 19:15:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 19:15:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 35418 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2005 19:16:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 35396 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2005 19:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 35383 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2005 19:16:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from smtp2.netdoor.com (HELO smtp2.netdoor.com) (208.137.128.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:16:00 -0700 Received: from webmail.netdoor.com (webmail.netdoor.com [208.137.128.51]) by smtp2.netdoor.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j3QJFBI5011520; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:15:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.160.63.212 (SquirrelMail authenticated user frankm) by webmail.netdoor.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:15:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <2710.128.160.63.212.1114542911.squirrel@webmail.netdoor.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2597.128.160.63.212.1114539855.squirrel@webmail.netdoor.com> <2688.128.160.63.212.1114540649.squirrel@webmail.netdoor.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:15:11 -0500 (CDT) From: "Frank McCreedy" To: "Joshua Slive" Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Reply-To: frankm@netdoor.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Location directive with url parameters X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N yep yep.. didn't think of the problems ordering could cause! > [sending back to the list] > > On 4/26/05, Frank McCreedy wrote: >> Thanks very much for the response. Any reason why Apache ignores that >> part of the URL? I don't mean that as a criticism, just wondering... >> >> It will probably be easier in my case just to make a separate servlet to >> handle the admin stuff. > > I'm not sure about the original idea -- query string is always stored > separately from the url-path in apache, so it could have just been an > oversight that they were not both applied. > > But note that it would be quite dangerous to limit access based on > query strings. For example, I bet your servlet would be quite happy > to let you get around the restrictions by accepting requests like > MyServlet?foo=bar&type=admin > > Joshua. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org