Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94445 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 18:39:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 18:39:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 13970 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 18:39:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13941 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 18:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13923 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2005 18:39:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mx2.ms.fr.atosorigin.com (HELO polaris.atos-infogerance.fr) (193.56.241.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:39:12 -0800 Received: from minotaure.atos-infogerance.fr ([193.56.47.17]) by polaris.atos-infogerance.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j05Id73t010587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:39:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from exchange2k301.gaia.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by minotaure.atos-infogerance.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j05Id48T021763 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:39:04 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: High performance apache logging Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:39:07 +0100 Message-ID: <43F6AE2C59CAC94EA7D45EE9103EECB9CC803B@exchange2k301.gaia.fr> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: High performance apache logging Thread-Index: AcTzPzMC5crm2R3USMKHFm6t0s9EygAFJANw From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Axel-St=E9phane__SMORGRAV?= To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N What do you mean by system load? Is it CPU utilisation or the number of = processes waiting for the CPU including those waiting for I/O? In any case, I would be very surprised if adding processing of Perl = scripts to the equation would improve performance... You most probably have a disk I/O performance problem. That can be = solved by investing in faster disks (SCSI in stead of ATA, for example), = or doing striping on multiple disks (RAID0). You could even do striping = across disks on different controllers. You did not say what kind of systems you're running. -ascs -----Message d'origine----- De : Josh Wyatt [mailto:josh.wyatt@hcssystems.com]=20 Envoy=E9 : mercredi 5 janvier 2005 16:54 =C0 : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : High performance apache logging Hi all, I'm interested in hearing anyone's thoughts on better performing logging = mechanisms for apache. My environment consists of four servers, = load-balanced using round-robin DNS (which works very well). We are = currently logging using just the standard local file logging, and it is = pushing system load pretty high due to our load. I'm leaning toward = something using a perl script, a big logserver, and pipes...? Thanks in advance, Josh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org