Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66347 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2004 18:54:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2004 18:54:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 10298 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2004 18:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 10054 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2004 18:54:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 9789 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2004 18:54:30 -0000 Received: from [206.46.164.52] (HELO oe-im1.bizmailsrvcs.net) (206.46.164.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:54:30 -0700 Received: from mm-ismta3.bizmailsrvcs.net ([192.168.133.28]) by oe-im1.bizmailsrvcs.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040613185420.XWEM2438.oe-im1.bizmailsrvcs.net@mm-ismta3.bizmailsrvcs.net> for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:54:20 -0500 Received: from xshellr8.com ([66.15.59.80]) by mm-ismta3.bizmailsrvcs.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040613185420.ZWZH9899.mm-ismta3.bizmailsrvcs.net@xshellr8.com> for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:54:20 -0500 Message-ID: <40CCA2DB.50604@xshellr8.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:54:19 -0700 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org References: <000601c451c3$aa151f00$cc07ded8@joeyhewitt.com> <40CBDAF4.9080308@earthlink.net> <40CC71B8.9060705@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <40CC71B8.9060705@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Missing larger images X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Very well said. Michael Michael Gordon wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > >>>> I've gathered from this list that Apache and Windows don't play well >>>> together unless you try combinations of the following directives: >>>> >>>> EnableSendfile Off >>>> EnableMMAP Off >>>> Win32DisableAcceptex >>>> >>>> Indeed, I think the problem of large files breaking is a common >>>> sympton that >>>> can be solved with the Sendfile directive there. I've never tried >>>> Apache on >>>> Windows, but these seem to have worked miracles for people in the >>>> past. >>>> >>> >> >> This advice is correct. The general problem is that many people install >> various add-ons to windows (such as software firewalls, virus checkers, >> etc) that break some of the advanced functionality that apache uses to >> speed the sending of files. These directives turn off the advanced >> functionality and make apache fall back to more basic (but slower) >> techniques. >> >> > Your analysis of the problem is correct in my case. Apache and > Windows XP Pro performed flawlessly with all the latest Windows > Updates and Norton's Internet Security Pro installed. All worked very > well together until I installed ZoneAlarm 5.0 Suite. There is > something inside ZoneAlarm 5.0 that breaks Apache from serving images. > > Unfortunately in todays world we have to use Windows PCs for > productivity reasons to build our web applications, in doing so we > must have a powerful firewall and anti-virus application installed and > running 24/7. Norton's was very good until their technical support > went to Hell, we cannot have any application where we cannot receive > excellent support, business competition will not allow downtime for > lack of support. If ZoneAlarm proves to be in the same category of > support as Norton's we will be looking elsewhere soon. > > While I still have my soapbox to stand on I will shout to the world > this message; it is support groups like the Apache Group that provide > the needed solutions for users like myself, without your guidance and > support we would not be able to exist as a small business. Thank you > all for your generous support and time. > > > >> >> >>> The only attribute I could not find was the Win32DisableAcceptex, it is >>> possible it is not included in some win 32 builds for Apache? >>> >> >> >> As you can see here: >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mpm_winnt.html#win32disableacceptex >> this directive is available in version 2.0.49 and later. >> >> > Thank you Joshua, for the updated information. > > Michael Gordon > >> Joshua. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server >> Project. >> See for more info. >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org >> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org