Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19473 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 15:47:23 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 15:47:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2415 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2003 15:47:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2401 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2003 15:47:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2388 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 15:47:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jarl.webthing.com) (81.174.213.244) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 15:47:03 -0000 Received: from fenris.webthing.com (fenris.webthing.com [192.168.10.5]) by jarl.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DE16195 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:35:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fenris.webthing.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78C84169; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:35:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fenris.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E730CC4 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:35:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:35:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Kew To: In-Reply-To: <5dec01c3c956$9b1c7610$652e50d5@profundis.se> Message-ID: <20031223143035.W967-100000@fenris.webthing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Limiting the number of accesses per directory X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Robert Andersson wrote: > Robert Mena wrote: > > I am facing a problem where a user's page > > (mydomain.com/~login) is too popular taking as much as > > 90% of the free daemons of my apache 1.3.X [...] > > > > I'd like to know what can I do to prevent that. > > What exactly is it you want to prevent? You are saying that this "page" is > taking 90% of the _free_ children; how do you determine this and why does it > matter? > > If you rather meant that it is taking 90% of all children ("slots"), you may > want to turn off Keep-Alive or lower the timeout, but that depends very much > on the nature of this "page". It does indeed. The OP mentioned PHP, which could be suppressing keepalive. In that case enabling it (with a low timeout value) could be a huge improvement (one TCP connection for the page, as opposed to a separate one for every image, stylesheet, script, etc). > > Besides mod_bandwidth what would you recommend ? > > mod_throttle? Upgrading to Apache 2 and Worker MPM, if your PHP can cope. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org