Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77104 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 23:21:49 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2003 23:21:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 608 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2003 23:21:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 577 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2003 23:21:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 501 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 23:21:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blade020.dedicated.netrino.co.uk) (217.204.9.213) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2003 23:21:18 -0000 Received: from SHUTTLE75 (82-33-92-173.cable.ubr09.azte.blueyonder.co.uk [82.33.92.173]) by blade020.dedicated.netrino.co.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id hA6NLLc0020299 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:21:22 GMT Message-ID: <009401c3a4bc$af9f1070$1c02a8c0@SHUTTLE75> From: "Philip Coombes" To: References: <006601c3a4ad$95ac4b60$1c02a8c0@SHUTTLE75> <007d01c3a4af$74cf98a0$1c02a8c0@SHUTTLE75> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:21:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.693, required 4, AWL 0.21, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache children not dying X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Joshua, Is 2.0.40 really that old? It's only 0.0.08 back from the latest one and is the latest RH rpm available. I'll try and build a later version which will hopefully fix this issue for me but that doesn't change the core issue which is that there is an issue in 2.0.40 which is the version that my users which are on RedHat use (and yes I know it will expire fairly shortly). I can't really expect them to build apache from source and that version is the latest RH rpm so if I can find a fix or workaround for the installed user base that works with this version that would suit me fine. If I was going to advise them to change apache versions I'd get them to go back to 1.3 until 2.0 gets a little more mature anyway. However, like I said I will try a build and report back. Cheers, Phil, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joshua Slive" To: Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:01 PM Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache children not dying > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Philip Coombes wrote: > > I'm using apache 2.0.40 on RH9 by the way, and this problem does not occur > > I don't know if anything has changed for this particular issue, but you > certainly aren't going to be able to get much help if you run an old > version like that. Try upgrading to the most recent version and see if > the problem goes away. > > Joshua. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org