Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Fri,
 24 Oct 2003 10:35:49 -0400 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Est_=28heure_d'=E9t=E9=29?=)
From: Joshua Slive <joshua@slive.ca>
To: users@httpd.apache.org, Robert Andersson <robert@profundis.nu>
In-Reply-To: <0c9b01c399f2$b7888a20$652e50d5@profundis.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0310240957120.740@Poste3947.hec.ca>
References: <8A42CAF3B4E59140AF21925609DDDB8F1107B0@SV50309.ruv.de>
 <Pine.WNT.4.58.0310221629060.1312@Poste3947.hec.ca>
 <0a0501c39924$0c5d7670$652e50d5@profundis.se>
 <0c9b01c399f2$b7888a20$652e50d5@profundis.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [users@httpd] mod_proxy:  problem with basic auth to backend  server  


On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Robert Andersson wrote:
> Yet, I am reluctant to call it a browser hack, as it is seems valid in an
> absolute URI, while it is the client's responsibility to parse and translate
> it for the scheme at hand.

Perhaps browser "hack" is a little strong.  But it is something that must
be resolved at the browser.  Since mod_proxy is acting as a client, it
could theoretically do that resolution.  But I can't imagine any real
situations were it would be useful.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org