Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 74904 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2003 14:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 74850 invoked from network); 11 May 2003 14:24:21 -0000 Received: from italy1.com (192.41.90.33) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2003 14:24:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 29849 invoked by uid 504); 11 May 2003 14:11:52 -0000 Received: from remo@italy1.com by jaguar.italy1.com by uid 507 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4262. spamassassin: 2.50. Clear:. Processed in 0.518719 secs); 11 May 2003 14:11:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO italy1.com) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 11 May 2003 14:11:51 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.103] (remo [66.87.235.253]) by italy1.com (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:11:44 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 08:24:04 -0600 To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030511104939.GA13960@rawbyte.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit From: Remo Mattei X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.77 (Count Turf) X-TMDA-Fingerprint: qZiXjl5CbF7SrF/IJ0nTulFnjMU X-Uptime: 4:11pm up 1 day, 10:11, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.06, 0.01 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SSL + 2.40 redhat No it's ip base but still does not work. Any other suggestions? I know it works on 1.3.27 but not in 2x with redhat. Thanks, -- Remo Mattei --cell 801-209-8554 http://www.italy1.com Freelance Networking-Security/Consultant MCSE, MCP, MCP+I, MCT Linux Trainer & Firewall Development remo@italy1.com > From: Daniel Lopez > Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org > Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 03:49:39 -0700 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SSL + 2.40 redhat > > On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 06:34:38PM -0600, Remo Mattei wrote: >> Hi guys has anyone experience the problem of having virtual host warning >> saying you do not have a NameVirtualHost. Once I add it to ssl.conf then my >> virtual host on my httpd.conf does not work anymore is there a way to make >> this work? I have virtualhost in httpd.conf and no in SSL but if I do not >> disable ssl then my virtual host is not going anywhere. .... Any suggestions >> are welcome. > > If you are trying to use named based virtual hosts with SSL, that is not > currently possible: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts > > > -- > Teach Yourself Apache 2 -- http://apacheworld.org/ty24/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org